You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 1225438 (Thread)

#
fail you?
(, Mon 19 May 2003, 16:53, archived)
# My religion says its true
name me ONE teacher who would argue with that? they can't.

They arn't aloud to contractdict religion.
(, Mon 19 May 2003, 16:55, archived)
# they can contradict
idiocy though.
(, Mon 19 May 2003, 16:57, archived)
# Not if it's your relgion
(, Mon 19 May 2003, 16:59, archived)
# So
when they ask, what relgion are you?
(, Mon 19 May 2003, 17:03, archived)
# "We don't belive in names"
Or say "We are thinking of a name"
(, Mon 19 May 2003, 17:09, archived)
# Oh-kay
and I imagine you believed the bollocks about putting Jedi down as your relgion on the last census.
(, Mon 19 May 2003, 17:14, archived)
# Is that a registared religion?
You could pretend to be the sad git on the last animiatrix film.
(, Mon 19 May 2003, 17:20, archived)
# if it's not the printed answer
it's wrong. and you'd lose marks for spelling :P
(, Mon 19 May 2003, 17:01, archived)
# Well that just shows
how god-damn-stupid the system is.

I wasn't aloud to use the computer in IT untill I wrote down a page on how i'ld go about doing whateva I was going to do.

We are talking about making some text Bold / Colours...

I only turned up for one lesson a month, did the months work, the substitute-teacher accused me of cheating. I then proceded to do it all infront of her again of a lunch-time detention.

She said I was free to go, so I said "Happy now?" - she gave me another hour's detention.

I crashed all the win 3.1 network.
(, Mon 19 May 2003, 17:07, archived)
# Mr Evans
the geography teacher. He'd argue with that.
(, Mon 19 May 2003, 17:01, archived)
# You are a b3ta regular
having a laugh

icmfp
(, Mon 19 May 2003, 17:02, archived)
# Yup, you could make a b3ta religion
that celebrates all things fluffy.

Im semmi seriouse, I got loads of teachers to back down on all manor of subjects.
(, Mon 19 May 2003, 17:11, archived)
# Threadjack
how many replys can you chain up?
(, Mon 19 May 2003, 17:14, archived)
# I guess it depends on the number
of words
(, Mon 19 May 2003, 17:14, archived)
# or does it?
I don't know
(, Mon 19 May 2003, 17:14, archived)
# My words are getting
crushed
(, Mon 19 May 2003, 17:15, archived)
# Eventualy
they'll all be on a new line each
(, Mon 19 May 2003, 17:15, archived)
# And that would be
pritty cool
(, Mon 19 May 2003, 17:15, archived)