a = b *a
aa = ab +(aa - 2ab)
2aa - 2ab = aa - ab /(aa - ab)
2 = 1
Hope you can understand it, used aa instead of a^2.
Prize for pointing out the error!
From the 100% Fact challenge. See all 469 entries (closed)
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 17:52, archived)
And that you've divided by zero.
aa-ab=0
What's the prize? I hope it's a picture of a kitten that you've made in photoshop, instead of nonsense like above.
Edit, you've still fucked up, and left 2aa instead of aa.
If you're not going to write it properly, what's the fucking point?
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 17:55, archived)
aa-ab=0
and you are right but we would rather have had a kitten anyway
Where's the kitten
Bring the kitten
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 18:01, archived)
for the kitten.
I'd be at home watching Countdown if I were in the mood for such puzzles right now.
/tetchy due to enforced attendance at structural biology seminar
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 18:05, archived)
Just seen this tube poll - "what winds you up about other people on the Tube?".
tube.tfl.gov.uk/content/faq/surveys/etiquette/etiquette2.asp
I like the entry "People who look like they may have an accordion at home".
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 17:54, archived)
fancy southerners coming on here with yer fancy trains! we've only just got the metro to my part of the world
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 17:55, archived)
Or is there more than one Metro?
And I'm not a fucking southerner, right? ;O)
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 17:56, archived)
and I'm sorry about the southerner slur :)
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 17:58, archived)
there are no threads on the tube, so no one can threadwaste, so how can anyone be a twunt?
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 17:58, archived)
That's called the "outside world". People swear there too.
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 18:06, archived)
unintentionally started a fracas?
Let me rephrase to avoid any doubt:
Everyone, without exception, including you and me, become (for the duration of our journey on the London Underground) pustulent festering sores on the soul of humanity, emobdying all that is corrupt and vile in the world and whilst belching out our bodily filth and narrowing our tiny isolated bigoted minds further still, endeavour to create as much discomfort and disharmony in our travelling companions as possible.
I get the bus, it 0nwZ. w00t!
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 18:13, archived)
last night on nthe tube kept staring at me and refused EVEN WHEN I ASKED HIM to not stare...
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 18:03, archived)
I can't quite follow that, but I believe you cock up your +/- signs when you're either factorising or expanding.
Like I say, I'm finding it hard to make head or tail of that.
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 17:55, archived)
(2x+2x2)/(x+x2) isnt 2 +2
its
(2x)/(x+x2) + (2x2)/(x+x2) for example
edit also 2-2 isnt 2 its 0
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 17:56, archived)
How you managed to tidy that up I'll never know. I really couldn't be arsed.
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 17:58, archived)
2 after each a.
gimme a sec im doing the maths in my head now.
ill find your mistake. i will.
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 17:57, archived)
if a=b
and 2a = ab, then b must equal 2.
and so 2x2xa - 2ab = a2 - ab
so 4a - 2ab = 2a - ab
then i just lose the thread
right.
2a - ab is
ba - ab is
bb - bb (a=b)
so they cancel out
4a - 2ab is
2x2xa - 2xaxb is
bxbxa - bxaxa is
bxbxb - bxbxb (a=b) again
so they cancel out
so '4a - 2ab = 2a - ab' is correct as it is stating 0=0
(at this point i went back to the board to check on the maths but it had been replaced)
edit: oh, a2 is a SQUARED.... oh thanks a lot
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 17:58, archived)
I think his proposed algebra assumes that neither a nor b are 0, but that's not stated.
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 18:04, archived)
Actually their value is irrelevent.
On a similar note, did you know that i^i = e^(-Pi/2) [where i = sqrt(-1)].
This is actually true, raise an imaginary number to the power of an imaginary number and get back a real number. I always thought that was odd.
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 18:11, archived)
Who cares what the square root of a negative number is anyway?
Cunts.
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 18:15, archived)
I dunno about you, but I don't do divides by zero :)
This is an *old* maths teaser. Like old as in about 1800's IIRC.
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 18:06, archived)
because it was edited out
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 18:08, archived)
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 18:12, archived)
but I'm too old to work out equations written badly in ASCII on a messageboard ;)
(, Thu 30 Oct 2003, 18:08, archived)
