.
From the The Reductionist Challenge challenge. See all 1013 entries (closed)
( , Mon 3 Nov 2003, 2:37, archived)
From the The Reductionist Challenge challenge. See all 1013 entries (closed)
( , Mon 3 Nov 2003, 2:37, archived)
hahahaah wooo
had no feckin clue what that was til it animated
/edit- was going to say it was a bog monster about to engulf a carrot, but alas
( ,
Mon 3 Nov 2003, 2:39,
archived)
/edit- was going to say it was a bog monster about to engulf a carrot, but alas
agreed
tho i had an arguement with dear roomie over whether or not the end was good. i declared that it would have been a bad movie if it hadn't ended like it did.
( ,
Mon 3 Nov 2003, 2:42,
archived)
Yup, had to have that ending
it was a good ending, but i didnt like it, takes a good film to make me want everything to turn out well in the end.
( ,
Mon 3 Nov 2003, 2:47,
archived)
oh, i didn't particularly like it either
don't rightly know how one *could* like it
but the movie would have been a bit foolish and trite without it
( ,
Mon 3 Nov 2003, 2:52,
archived)
but the movie would have been a bit foolish and trite without it
yup
i was quite surprised by the pacing of the film, i was expecting it to be faster/more to happen in it, but i was pleasantly surprised
( ,
Mon 3 Nov 2003, 2:56,
archived)
there was much more reminiscence
than actual action, i thought.
but it worked, so good on them.
( ,
Mon 3 Nov 2003, 2:59,
archived)
but it worked, so good on them.
that's what worked well
the movie actually tok place over the course of about 24 hours, so it felt slow, but the flashback stuff meant they managed to fit quite a bit in.
ahh well, bed for me in a minute, night all
( ,
Mon 3 Nov 2003, 3:02,
archived)
ahh well, bed for me in a minute, night all