
I asked why this got deleted yesterday and was told that the moderator was probably drunk and/or pressed the wrong button. If a moderator is going to delete it again then please at least tell me why (afinkawan at yahoo.com), as it is not racist, is safe for work, doesn't break any of the rules in the FAQ and is less offensive than a lot of the things posted here!
From the Alternative Funerals challenge. See all 234 entries (closed)
(, Fri 20 Aug 2004, 10:12, archived)
Mind buzzing overtime with hummus relating to Suttee and Sweep related post.. mmm...
(, Fri 20 Aug 2004, 10:14, archived)
I suppose at Mr. Corbett's funeral they could suttee Sweep and Sue...
(, Fri 20 Aug 2004, 10:17, archived)
Saw it come, saw it go ... was confused by the whole affair.
(, Fri 20 Aug 2004, 10:15, archived)
as there are email spiders that pick up on the @ symbol and copy your address for spamming write it as such yourname 'at' youraddress ;)
(, Fri 20 Aug 2004, 10:19, archived)
But Yahoo also seems to have a good spam filter. Hardly ever get crud making it through to my inbox.
(, Fri 20 Aug 2004, 10:20, archived)
- I agree with you about the removal of your image, even though it's a subject that most people find icky there has been plenty worst on b3ta.
(, Fri 20 Aug 2004, 10:23, archived)
not that I shall be seeking to see what the fuss is about if goatse is anything to go by I'll by-pass tubgirl
(, Fri 20 Aug 2004, 10:27, archived)
I'm assuming I probably don't really want to know but I've never heard of that one. Anyone point me in the right direction?
(, Fri 20 Aug 2004, 10:31, archived)
but I wouldn't recommend that you do.
(, Fri 20 Aug 2004, 10:32, archived)
What's the current b3ta onomatopoeia for retching noises?
(, Fri 20 Aug 2004, 10:36, archived)
but I always use Puuuukkkke!
(, Fri 20 Aug 2004, 10:38, archived)
I'll just go with the theory that the moderator was on crack/having a brainspasm/suffering from cackfingers that day.
(, Fri 20 Aug 2004, 10:26, archived)
at the time and had a spazz
(, Fri 20 Aug 2004, 10:28, archived)
but I expect I would have categorised that as a subsection of cackfingers.
(, Fri 20 Aug 2004, 10:29, archived)
perhaps they went to linky it and suffered temporary loss of memory and forgot your url.
(, Fri 20 Aug 2004, 10:31, archived)