
this time its 4 days long
*edit added smoke on water effect thing from original still
(, Sat 2 Jul 2005, 9:52, archived)
that man.
oh erm total threadjack but i'd like to know is the GIMP worth downloading?
(, Sat 2 Jul 2005, 9:57, archived)
i really shouldve posted on the talk board but i just woke up so i cant be bothered
(, Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:02, archived)
you could try serif photoplus
www.freeserifsoftware.com I think; not as good as PS (and GIMP probably) but a lot easier to use than GIMP
.. and remember - Photoshop Elements is only 50-60 quid, and very good
(, Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:01, archived)
after they bought macromedia I dunno if I`ll buy anything of theirs ever again
.. unless they do a version for Linux
*builds up to a rhythmic fwap*
(, Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:03, archived)
i don't have teh moneyz for photoshop
(, Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:18, archived)
unfortunately it saves your project files (all the layers etc.) in a stupid format that only it understands, but if you think it`s shit, try gimp
(, Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:29, archived)
no its not the pope
its a woolly monkey stuck (badly) to martin sheens head.
(, Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:07, archived)
do you know anything about designing
websites in flash, or at least a
good tutorial?
(, Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:09, archived)
oh wait
it's 15 fookin quid!!!!!!!!!!
(, Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:11, archived)
computer arts
i only mentioned it as i picked it up yesterday
but then spotted the price
puts it back down...
(, Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:25, archived)
flashkit isn`t a bad site for bits and pieces, but I think you`re better off building "static" (even if it`s dynamically generated) and adding bits of flash where appropriate
otherwise you`ll end up with a flash movie as a container and be loading movie clips into a central "main" area, with some navigation buttons, etc. - not that hard to do, but a pain in the bum to maintain
(, Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:12, archived)
and settle for Flash 6 as the version 7 plugin isn`t used anywhere near as much.. some clients (oooh clients.. drugs + prostitution) like whizzy flash stuff at the expense of 40% of users being able to see and hear it all!
(, Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:16, archived)
something like this:
www.ceramicaplus.cz/flash/index_en.html
edit: god I hate websites with sound!
(, Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:20, archived)
plus search engines and the like wouldn`t have a chance at spidering that page - then you have to worry about flash plugin detection scripts and stuff
but I`m not gonna piss on your parade - you get some nice`n`easy layout using flash (i.e. don`t have to dick around trying to line stuff up) so work away; you can always save images off and make a static HTML version that way
just use fonts that are available on Linux boxes ;) there`s a Microsoft free font pack available, which is nice for compatibility
(, Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:24, archived)
I'm not too worried about the spider thing, as
it's a rather specialized local market. But
yeah it is nice not having to screw with tables
and rollover scripting . . .
(, Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:31, archived)
that's what I've been messing with, loadmovie()
and unloadmovie(). I don't know CSS and I don't
want to learn something new so I was going to
do the whole thing in flash.
(, Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:16, archived)
and use tables if you have to (shut up Syncubus.. some people still use tables! :p), CSS is OK
just stick to stuff like
<p class="bigtext">here is big text</p>
then define this in your stylesheet file like
.bigtext {
font-size: 9000px;
}
it keeps it easy to maintain, without going crazy with complexity
(, Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:21, archived)
then I figured, might as well be modern, and
started poking around with CSS, then I did it
in Flash, which I already know(sort of).
(, Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:24, archived)
and remember you`ll have to update this stuff later, so keep it simple :)
I don`t like their approach up there as you go to a new page every time you click a link, instead of it just loading in the bits it needs
(, Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:26, archived)