and post flyers for ideas
/what I see it as :)
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:14, archived)
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:17, archived)
A spark is a chain of electrons following a path to ground.
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:25, archived)
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:27, archived)
that's just an ember... a burning hot peice of flint that has broken off the main peice.
EDIT: I don't even know how you'd propose to use flint anyway - you'd need to strike each one (successfully ) 250 times/second (assuming there's only 4 cylinders) just to keep the engine at a fast idle.
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:28, archived)
"they have them flint spark plugs innit?",
does this not imply that the sparks we were talking about come from flint.
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:30, archived)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spark
Edit. and diesel engines don't use spark plugs. Once they've started they just keep running using the power of science.
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:31, archived)
the comp ses:
"Invent new things to take the place of our electric powered friends and post them on the board."
it doesnt ses:
"have half arsed ill informed arguments about the nature of electricity and combustion engins and that"
if only science had achieved a unified theory of complex systems
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:34, archived)
could you possibly see your way to nominating me for the nobel prize for getting drunk and crashing into things - cheers
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:42, archived)
its enamel. If you throw enamel against glass it shatters it
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:31, archived)
Not the disappearance of electrical forces.
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:27, archived)
what then?
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:22, archived)
Yes, our brains operate using electrical signals and impulses. Hence we'd all die
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:25, archived)
are we talking a world where we havin't discovered electrisity yet, or are we talking about a world with no magnetism (and thus no means of generating electrisity)?
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:27, archived)
They are the same thing.
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:31, archived)
Read my post again.
EDIT: Well, no, they're not the same, but yes, you need magnetism for electrisity to be generatable.
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:34, archived)
but without magnetism we would have no way of harnessing it.
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:37, archived)
... and fuel cells
... and rubbing balloons on stuff.
We're probably not supposed to think about that too deeply.
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:34, archived)
for electrisity to actually flow at all... I'm not sure though.
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:37, archived)
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:43, archived)
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:20, archived)
that a combustion engine doesn't use at least some form of electricity
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:21, archived)
look up how diesel vehicles work. No electrics required, as long as you've got some method of starting it - hand crank, clockwork or compressed air for instance.
Kids today...
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:23, archived)
combustion process in a diesel engine are the glow plugs. But you can still start the engine without them... it just takes a while.
Or you can add a chemical to the fuel to keep it thin at low temperatures.
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:39, archived)

For roasting peas.
EDIT: Plus I did see some program on BBC where they restored a steam powered truck. It was dead crap compared to pertol/diesel.
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:22, archived)
I've seen some variably-succesful attempts to create steam-powered cars, but the real strength of steam is in sheer power - moving heavy stuff like trains. You don't _need_ gears with a steam engine - it's strong enough to go from zero up to top revs.
/edit: it's rubbish with response times though; stoking a boiler an hour before you want to drive to work is a bit shit.
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:30, archived)
there would be no message board for jack to post his cartoon time request on every day, and so he would have to go around and hand out flyers instead.
Actually I think it's pretty funny.
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:15, archived)
That sound like JJ's kind of thing.
(, Mon 1 Aug 2005, 17:18, archived)
