You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » If Tom Cruise Was God » Message 5974882

[challenge entry] sorry... very very sorry
groups.msn.com/_Secure/0TADhAkYY!cd7R4lkfqAzelhyV4EA0dEGREX1w4jT*bnUwFu26LAJ*rvR4!sg6zsOKUO13jKMpm9EH91jqvRvqn0CaRrW8IssKnYkLZ8wK35DCJyxBAhe5g/katie_cock.jpg

modedit: nsfw. changed to linky.

From the If Tom Cruise Was God challenge. See all 213 entries (closed)

(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:03, archived)
# I can't see what you've changed

(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:04, archived)
# Would

(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:04, archived)
# NSFW
link it
(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:05, archived)
# why
its no less safe than any of the other cdc images that get posted..
(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:06, archived)
# uhhhh,
the naked woman?
(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:08, archived)
# whos been covered up
you can't see anything, its just typical board naziism... imho people who are at work should be fucking doing some work and not looking at websites like this anyway.
(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:10, archived)
# Get a job hippy

(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:14, archived)
# i have a job
i work nights and when i'm at work i concentrate on my job not on making images and posting themon a website, If anyone on here is being paid to be on b3ta then please tell me who you work for cause that sounds like a great job. as for the image being NSFW it was censored enough to get onto kids tv let alone on a website full of cdc's gay porn and use of the word fuck and cunt continually..
(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:17, archived)
# Yeah, I was only messing
But what constitutes NSFW is decided by the majority opinion here, and that seems to be against you in this case. And not to sound like an arsehole here, but if you don't like it, that's too bad. It's not board naziism just because it's not what you want.
(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:20, archived)
# Come on
board naziism is when people moan about an image being 51k. Not something that could possibly get someone sacked. I didn't mean to have a go...
(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:15, archived)
# if you could be sacked for looking at that
then maybe you shouldn't be on here whilst at work anyway..
(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:18, archived)
# It's half two.
Lunch breaks.
(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:22, archived)
# Look... Let's stop beating about the bush and trying to be friendly. It's done like this:
B3tan Senseless, PISS OFF YOU COCKING ARSE CLAM.


Just kidding ;) But try to post NSFW stuff with a warning and if you can, after 5 pm GMT.
(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 16:49, archived)
# a little NSFW
maybe a link?
(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:05, archived)
# is that
suitable for work?
I mean, if you dont work in a swedish brothel ... cos that could be useful for work if you do ... I mean, I don't want to cast dispersions on anyone's jobs, or assume that anybody does something dodgey or even dull as a career ... it's just that it may be a good idea to decide exactly what NSFW means ... don't you think?
But in summary ... it's not safe for my job ... they're all old and don't understand what a naked lady is ... except when they go online for their 7am pre-morning perv ... or they're looking down their secretaries clevage ... not that every old person does that, I mean, it's entirely upto their persuasion, they may like young men ... not that I have anything against that *continues muttering into the distance grabbing coat on the way*
(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:08, archived)
# Ignore what I said
you linked it by the time I'd posted ...
(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:09, archived)
# all that effort, wasted!

(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:10, archived)
# i'm not surprised
it must of taken you half hour to write that reply!
(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:10, archived)
# it's surprising really ...
once i get going it all just flows effortlessly ... at least that's what my girl friend says ..
(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:12, archived)
# Had it linked for him . . .


(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:10, archived)
# now that's
service!! (or was it cervix ... I don't have my classes on)
(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:16, archived)
# stop waffling on next time and just say NSFW!

(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:11, archived)
# that's just
so impersonal!!
(, Thu 1 Jun 2006, 14:14, archived)