You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Celebrity Autobiographies » Message 6239219

[challenge entry] Chapter 4: Fucked up Mona's mouth again.

From the Celebrity Autobiographies challenge. See all 524 entries (closed)

(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:21, archived)
# yesyesyes
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:22, archived)
# I agree wholeheartedly
I was in an art gallery in Dublin yesterday. I had to leave when I was overheard asking my girlfriend "how does a pile of fucking sacks with a light shining on them constitute art?" by the nobber of a curator.
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:25, archived)
# the fact that it raised your emotional level
to some people, would define it as art.
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:27, archived)
# im with the others
By its original and broadest definition, art (from the Latin ars, meaning "skill" or "craft") is the product or process of the effective application of a body of knowledge, most often using a set of skills; this meaning is preserved in such phrases as "liberal arts" and "martial arts". However, in the modern use of the word, which rose to prominence after 1750, “art” is commonly understood to be skill used to produce an aesthetic result (Hatcher, 1999)
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:35, archived)
# Yes but
is it art?
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:37, archived)
# if they used some skill to create it
thats my definition which makes all the cap on this board art as people hav esom skill with photoshop. its art but art doesnt make it good.
now good thats something only the beholder can decide the word art means nothing now thanks to picasso and whorehole who added opinion
of the veiwer to the equasion by putting imagination into art. making the term means the artist doesnt slavishly recreate or represent.
now artists have to have an imagination or in the case of some sacks with a light on or a pile of bricks an opinion. perhaps im wrong perhaps this should be on the talk board.
i would go on talk but they mock me and send me back here.
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:42, archived)
# Bastards!
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:51, archived)
# they mean
well
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:54, archived)
# artists often use abstraction to mask and underlying lack of substance
{/break siesta}
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:45, archived)
# But to most people
Art takes skill.


Saying, 'Your dog's dead.' raises emotional levels.
Art? Actually, yeah, that would be art.

That's something for the newsletter. Go round telling people their pet or whatever is dead. It's okay because it's art.
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:36, archived)
# I bet there is some arse at Edinburgh doing just that & calling it art
of course killing the pet with a lump hammer and projecting this over the corpse of the owner as a n installation would get you plaudits and a grant.
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:44, archived)
# Ladies and Gentlemen
I give you... ART!

ArtAttack, hehe... oh, I kill me. And pets.
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:59, archived)
# ART!
the new 'SCIENCE!' ? Discuss.
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 18:18, archived)
# touche
I went in there because it was a sculpture exhibit, which I like.

I'll have to find the photo of my blu-tac horse, it's great!
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:36, archived)
# what a cunt
that is a legitimate piece of art critique.

He should have engaged you in a dialogue about the relative merits of the abstract and realist schools of modern art.

But the art-nazi just threw you out!
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:36, archived)
# perhaps in asking him to leave he was trying to add
performance art and raising his emothing lvl.
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:45, archived)
# ha ha
he is now a lvl30 art critic

all he needs is The Independant column of infinite ignorage, stamina+2, intellect-4
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:52, archived)
# added skills
quoff
stride
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:58, archived)
# hahaha :)
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:24, archived)
# lol!
spot on :D

The book was ok; the film was far too serious lol
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:26, archived)
# Ahahahaaha
Ace. I love how seriously everyones taken it. Even though its in the fiction section of every bookshop, people just love a good conspiracy.
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:28, archived)
# PSSSSST!!!, Did you know Lord of the Rings is actually about the Industrialisation of the British Isles?
eh? oh, sorry, it actually is.
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:29, archived)
# Hee hee
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:33, archived)
# Fantastic
I have grown to hate the Da Vinci Code soooooo much. If they'd just had the book and left it at that, I wouldn't mind so much, but it bacame such an obsession that everyone jumped on the bandwagon. Grr.
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 17:43, archived)
# ^ this
And people are actually believing it, even though it's a work of fiction and most of its claims are old and already disproved.
(, Thu 17 Aug 2006, 23:54, archived)
# Fantastic!
:D
(, Fri 18 Aug 2006, 12:38, archived)