You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Revive The Dome » Message 6821879

[challenge entry] second time lucky


shrink the dome! then we wont have to worry about it.

compo entry and second try at a band wagon in one, better do you think?

From the Revive The Dome challenge. See all 209 entries (closed)

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:26, archived)
# i'd say twice as bad
but i've been failing at basic maths for a lot of today.
holy crap! when did it pass midnight?!
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:28, archived)
# shit!
is it tomorrow already?
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:29, archived)
# what i mean is
shit, i've got to be up early tomorrow and i'm really wide awake! hot piss!
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:29, archived)
# me too!
i'm supposed to be in work for 7am! :S

*hot piss* indeed!
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:30, archived)
# confused
i thought "hot piss" was good and "pisscorns" was bad?
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:34, archived)
# hot pisscorns sounds pretty unpleasant

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:38, archived)
# There's an obvious answer here
that I think is best avoided.
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:29, archived)
# only if you want to avoid a slap (;

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:30, archived)
# Result.

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:31, archived)
# but 'er not blondie anymore, surely?

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:35, archived)
# so?

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:35, archived)
# 100% improvement

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:39, archived)
# 100% !?!??!
);
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:39, archived)
# well, *I* think it's an improvement
100% might be a slight exaggeration.
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:42, archived)
# i'll just take that as a compliment, and have done with it!

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 1:01, archived)
#
random bouts of dozeyness should be a thing of the past.


don't hurt me, i'm joking.
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:41, archived)
# I DON'T UNDERSTAND!

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:48, archived)
# cos you're blonde
(runs away and hides)
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:50, archived)
# not anymore duh!
and i dont understand, because you dont make any sense!
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 1:00, archived)
# get used to it.
i never make any sense.
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 1:05, archived)
# 30 minutes ago

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:30, archived)
# *slaps*

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:30, archived)
# again?

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:31, archived)
# *Slaps*

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:36, archived)
# *sees stars*

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:39, archived)
# KADLAMMO!

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:43, archived)
# hahahahahahaha
you're special.
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:44, archived)
# PHWOAR!

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:40, archived)
# DLAM!

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:41, archived)
# DLAM DLAM DLAM FUCKING DLAM.

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:42, archived)
# About 30 minutes ago.
Zedztime
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:30, archived)
# *slaps you too even though you were slow*

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:30, archived)
# Yeah, sorry
I had to check my clock. Turns out it's fast.
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:32, archived)
# well...
ill keep on trying, but ill not bother you fine fellows with further results
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:31, archived)
# oi! some of us aint fellows.....

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:34, archived)
# then condisder it a unisex term

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:39, archived)
# it actually is.

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:42, archived)
#




rats.
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:48, archived)
# Dillenium Mome
Nicely :D
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:29, archived)
# I like this

(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:29, archived)
# You did it again.
It's not just a blanket blur for the top and bottom of the image - it's for things in the foreground and background. The yellow sticky up bits are part of the thing you're "focusing" on, but you've blurred them anyway just because they stick up towards the top of the photo. This is wrong.

Try looking at some really close-up photos on flickr (with very shallow depth-of-field) and you'll get the idea.
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:33, archived)
# AI No U
When this man gets a project into his head, he sure does go for it. Bin playing with his gimp all day has he! Woo and yay to you ;)
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 0:34, archived)
# good first effort at tilt-shift
but you need to think more about the physical z-planes you are trying to blur. It's not just a matter of gradiating the blur from top to bottom (unless you are producing a tilt-shift of a flat plane!)

For example, the top of the middle pointy-bit is blurring to the same level as the far edge of the dome. This isn't right, as the top of this particular pointy bit is pretty much the same distance away from the lens as the rest of it. So some z-channel work for the fake lens blur has to be intruduced to make it properly convincing.

/late night rant blog
(, Mon 5 Feb 2007, 3:42, archived)