Do magazine covers count?

( AgeOwns *waiting to be groomed*, Thu 5 Apr 2007, 22:19, archived)

They are super carp
those magazines. Must be utter twunts who spend their lives writing about absolutely nothing at all.
( its_hatorah_bitch is b3ta the devil you know on, Thu 5 Apr 2007, 22:21, archived)

i prefer
bream. Super bream :-)
(Waisted Fred I say who Sir, you Sir?, Thu 5 Apr 2007, 22:25, archived)

super turbot charged

( plentyofants http://lidlbuylidl.blogspot.com/, Thu 5 Apr 2007, 22:26, archived)

Actually I do too
carp just seemed more apt in this particular instance.
( its_hatorah_bitch is b3ta the devil you know on, Thu 5 Apr 2007, 22:28, archived)

It's the fact that they pay photographers...
..to take pictures up 'celebs' skirts that amuses/pisses me off. I don't blame the reporters though...they get paid for essentially recycling old articles and ideas... It's the people who buy the magazines that are the mugs.
( AgeOwns *waiting to be groomed*, Thu 5 Apr 2007, 22:27, archived)

People are stupid*
They buy what they are told to buy.

*except your good self, obviously.
( oldpeopleinthecemetery, Thu 5 Apr 2007, 22:28, archived)

I think it's Fairy Nuff
if people leave them on the train and you read them - because then you don't feel a mug for actually buying the dross. You just feel sick after reading it. :)
( its_hatorah_bitch is b3ta the devil you know on, Thu 5 Apr 2007, 22:31, archived)

True about it being OK if you don't actually pay for it.
But in the cases of these wastes of tree pulp, I can't even bear to be in the same room as someone reading it.
( oldpeopleinthecemetery, Thu 5 Apr 2007, 22:33, archived)

Sneaky half-relevant pea

(Super Jet Shoes saw "Kung Fu Panda" for free and it was quite good, Thu 5 Apr 2007, 23:08, archived)