
From the Making Safe Things Dangerous challenge. See all 479 entries (closed)
(, Thu 2 Aug 2007, 11:20, archived)
Nicely done.
In other news: What was he thinking?
(, Thu 2 Aug 2007, 11:23, archived)
might become a popular choice over the next couple of years
edit: you may not actually want to know exactly what he was thinking
(, Thu 2 Aug 2007, 11:25, archived)
... that it was research for 'Help' the show he does with Paul Whitehouse, you can't fault his dedication to research.
As for the charges of rutting a young 'un he denies it all but you have to wonder.
(, Thu 2 Aug 2007, 11:31, archived)
What the hell IS 'buggery' in this context, anyway? I thought it had become a largely meaningless, tongue-in-cheek (or arse, heh) word for general rudeness that was only ever used semi-ironically these days because of its massively old-school connotations?
It's silly Victorian nonsense like this that makes the rest of the world think we all nibble cucumber sarnies with Her Maj. Can't we just charge him with fucking a child and be done with it?
/antiquated legal procedures irritation blog
(, Thu 2 Aug 2007, 11:38, archived)
"Johnathan Ross you have been accused of Fucking small children, how do you plead?"
He's next
(, Thu 2 Aug 2007, 11:40, archived)
"For the brutal gangland shooting of two teenage boys on bicycles, we hereby sentence you to 18 years in prison, plus an additional six months for being a cad and a rotter."
(, Thu 2 Aug 2007, 11:44, archived)
people who plead not guitly but are then found to be all of the guilty, don't also get charged with perjury.
(, Thu 2 Aug 2007, 11:59, archived)
I like old-school connotations.
(, Thu 2 Aug 2007, 11:56, archived)
well - there's nothing wrong with it, perfectly normal... and besides, nothing bad can come of it...
(, Thu 2 Aug 2007, 11:27, archived)
and I think research was mentioned
(, Thu 2 Aug 2007, 11:36, archived)