thinks I like to fake my drawings, hopefully this might clear things up.
www.b3ta.com/users/profile.php?id=47549
Thats his profile, so you can read the annoying cock's contributions to the sum of human intelligence. And heres some piccies taken with my phone just to prove a point. More astute b3tans might bother to read what I've written on the top left of the piccie.
Oh and thanks to the many b3tans who have pm'd me today and offered their kind support, because at least they can recognise that I have worked hard on this picture and that I am able to do more than just colour in other b3tans work. Eh Pasanonic?
farm2.static.flickr.com/1009/1018711052_47241899ea_o.jpg
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:25, archived)
Plug: b3ta.com/links/IMDb_s_reviews_for_My_Little_Pony
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:26, archived)

(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:59, archived)
At first I wasn't bothered but then I started to think "why should I let some talentless keyboard warrior denigrate my hard work?"
Its all a bit silly I know.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:28, archived)
i'm not a fire stoker i'm a fire stoker's mate.
may not have any mates
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:30, archived)
that justifies a comment like that, the ignore button says more than petty jibes.
that is all.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:39, archived)
and yes it's a
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:29, archived)
Grow up and lets try and stop this place turning in to a fucking playground.
Your pictures are well done, some people like them, some people don't. Thats life.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:31, archived)
well, not until school starts again anyway
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:36, archived)
but by failing to take this kind of thing to e-mail, and using a /board thread to snipe...
a) other people's hard work gets pushed off the first page and
b) the hummus gets diluted with bile, vitriol and flamethrower fuel, rendering it unappetising.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:49, archived)
whether 'liking' ever came into it. I'd feel pissed off if someone accused me of applying a filter when I've crafted something akin to this with my bare hands. Of course you're within your rights to dislike the end product but I'm not sure that's the issue.
I don't want to get into fistses-cuffs or anything. Or do I? I haven't thought it through.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:37, archived)
I just think it shouldn't be done by trying to drag everyone else in to it and gang up against Pasanonic who it seems isn't here to justify his comments.
Sounds like a fairly innocent mistake to me though, he thought it was a filter job, to a degree, that's a compliment for being so accurate in the copy.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:42, archived)
but Panasonics work never amounts to more than filters or tracing or bad colouring, generally omitting to mention he didn't draw the original himself, added to that he used to be Zoot Cadilliac and changed his name after he was chased off the board for various reasons.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:44, archived)
You make sense. How am I going to get a fight out of this?
Fancy an arm wrestle?
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:45, archived)
are we allowing table holding with the other hand or not?
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:47, archived)
we would hold each other's hands under the table?
I must have been playing it wrong all these years.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:49, archived)
Anyway, I'll shut up about it now. If you zombify me.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:54, archived)
pasonic seems to make plenty of enemys for himself on here
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:32, archived)
but probably only because I haven't ever spoken to him. He seems to be disliked by pretty much everyone else here though.
And your drawings are very woo indeed, Mr. Lasers.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:33, archived)
Ha ha ha, nicely justified.
Woo to the skillz. I don't know where the original thread went but I should've given it the props deserved at the original moment.
I'm a mess. Sorry.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:33, archived)
but photorealistic pics can be fun to make.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:42, archived)
I don't even have any artistic ability.
I don't even have a life.
Be glad you aren't ME.
Don't mess with my b3ta. It's all I have.
Now, a cup of coffee.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:36, archived)
is a popular passtime around these parts. or even just sanctimony itself -- witness the "fail" thread below. i've no problem with pasanonic and i like what he posts. i've also no problem with you and i liked the brando pic and i'd have liked whatever either of you did whether it was done with filters or done by hand. kudos for defending yourself though, i wish i could draw that well.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:44, archived)
it would appear that PPL has already defended himself with some vigour!
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:54, archived)
and are part of the fun of B3ta
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 17:06, archived)
And everyone who tries to say otherwise is a big, mean poopoohead. That'll teach 'em.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:51, archived)
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 16:54, archived)
but then I'm a pencil doodler, and thats doodler, as you drawing is waaaaaaaaaaaay better than my shit
and I like it when people do it properly, or use pens for that matter
I wonder how many artists there would be without photoshop and it's like
anyway, try think happier thoughts, shit just drags you down and too many folk come along for the ride
:)
oh, incase of confusion, thats a fucking excellent drawing
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 17:00, archived)
do your pencils not work over page creases? Perhaps you have an auto delete on. I see your efforts to make it look real and it's a quality shop. Perhaps you should do more of this and stop being a lying cunt and trying to make me look bad.
I also love how your 'pencil' work has such a decise, clean edge to the picture . Everyone has that talent.. I know my cheats and you are good one.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 17:20, archived)
he uses an eraser for the white bits, isn't it obvious?
anyway I've had enough of this shite
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 17:26, archived)
or are you taking the piss?
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 17:36, archived)
why the fuck would you sketch all the background defects and edge faults? You would, as a discerning artist, use your discretion and make it look right. You would not sketch in all the details and defects from the original picture.
it would never happen. Akvis sketch filter.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 17:51, archived)
It's not a trace, but a copy. And in fairness he's done a damn fine job, copying everything down to the background, and what the hell is wrong with that? If it was a shop then the background could easily have been cloned out. He has used his discretion to make it look "right". The background detail is part of the original, henceforth right.
You could have admitted your mistake and apologised, but now you're just being plain stubborn.
If he's that good a shopper as you claim, then he surely wouldn't have needed a filter to do something like that to begin with.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 18:24, archived)
your sketch book seems to be made up of a photocopy / cheap print on the left and a reasonable, but noticeable photoshop on the right.
I'll take it on the chin all day, but please don't call me a liar when it's obvious for anyone who makes art that you are a lying cunt.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 18:22, archived)
your head appears to have popped back out of your ringpiece.
Do yourself a favour and be quiet. You haven't got the slightest idea what you're talking about.
Idiot.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 19:49, archived)
This 'kid' is 35 years old, self employed, with his own house and a much larger brain than yours, with a degree of talent you only surpass when it comes to being a complete cunt. And just to make you eat your fucking semi-intelligent rabble of a post, have a butcher's at this unfiltered and much higher resolution scan of the image I spent hours drawing over the last few days. Cropped because I can't be arsed uploading an 8MB image just to satisfy you.
www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1019631311&size=o
Then when you've looked at that image and realised what a spectacularly stupid arse you are, perhaps you'll disappear back up your rusty sheriff's badge and not reappear. You're quite reviled on this board.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 20:09, archived)