Dickheaddo your pencils not work over page creases? Perhaps you have an auto delete on. I see your efforts to make it look real and it's a quality shop. Perhaps you should do more of this and stop being a lying cunt and trying to make me look bad.
I also love how your 'pencil' work has such a decise, clean edge to the picture . Everyone has that talent.. I know my cheats and you are good one.
(
Pasanonic so I compo anything with words, right?, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 17:20,
archived)
O_ohe uses an eraser for the white bits, isn't it obvious?
anyway I've had enough of this shite
(
Bloop wasn't here on, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 17:26,
archived)
you really are miles out on this one...that's a sketch :)(
prodigy69 Errapolis, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 17:35,
archived)
do you really believe this is a fakeor are you taking the piss?
(
Mousing, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 17:36,
archived)
I know it's a fakewhy the fuck would you sketch all the background defects and edge faults? You would, as a discerning artist, use your discretion and make it look right. You would not sketch in all the details and defects from the original picture.
it would never happen. Akvis sketch filter.
(
Pasanonic so I compo anything with words, right?, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 17:51,
archived)
Why?OCD?
*taps table eight times and rubs right earlobe*
(
An Eagle in Your Mind, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 17:57,
archived)
You would sketch it because that's what is on the originalIt's not a trace, but a copy. And in fairness he's done a damn fine job, copying everything down to the background, and what the hell is wrong with that? If it was a shop then the background could easily have been cloned out. He has used his discretion to make it look "right". The background detail is part of the original, henceforth right.
You could have admitted your mistake and apologised, but now you're just being plain stubborn.
If he's that good a shopper as you claim, then he surely wouldn't have needed a filter to do something like that to begin with.
(, Sun 5 Aug 2007, 18:24, archived)