You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » The Secret Lives of Animals » Message 7585634

[challenge entry] they never found the fossil chainsaws
.. but it definately went on.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

From the The Secret Lives of Animals challenge. See all 364 entries (closed)

(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:33, archived)
# who needs evidence?
Not the Americans thats for sure, woo
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:34, archived)
#
www.creationmuseum.org/
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:37, archived)
#

(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:45, archived)
# arf! :D

(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:48, archived)
# Going Muff Diving
lol
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:07, archived)
# lol

(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:07, archived)
# Oh the embarassment
How in the name of all that is rational do they get off calling that place a 'museum'?
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:49, archived)
# A museum is a "permanent institution in the service of society
and of its development, open to the public, which acquires, conserves, researches, communicates and exhibits, for purposes of study, education, enjoyment, the tangible and intangible evidence of people and their environment".
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:50, archived)
# My bad, then
I usually associated the institution of a museum as being a place that exhibits things of a scientific nature and also goes on to explain their function or origin in a way that is tested and researched to support their pedigree. I'm not the best at putting it into words, I know, but I thought a that the purpose of such a place was to show us what stands up to scientific scrutiny.

And besides, why does that place have a "Dinosaur Den"? I don't remember much about them in the bible!
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:56, archived)
# the behemot
they believe they were dinosaurs


*shakes head*
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:59, archived)
# Anything to make the theory fit the evidence.

(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:01, archived)
# sounds like science!
\human evolution blog
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:15, archived)
# or was that the other way 'round?
making the something something...? the bed? Yes, need to make the bed. The coffee? Sure, I'd like a cup, thanks.
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:18, archived)
# and the leviathan.
But then unicorns are in the Bible as well, and dragons.
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:20, archived)
# What about werewolves?
cos I've heard that the co-existence of dinosaurs and man is claimed to be proven by legends of dragons in every culture, but lots of cultures have a werewolf myth of some kind, with a change in animal depending on where they are.

So, do werewolves exist? Creationists say YES!
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:49, archived)
# Legends of Dragons in every culture?
Every one?

You mean to tell me that Hindus, Tazmanians, Inuits, Iraqis, Welsh, ancient Greeks, and even Ethiopians have legends of dragons that they tell tales about?

Don't know about the werewolves, either.

Not professing any one belief over another, here. Just rambling...
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 20:01, archived)
# I'm sure there are vampires too if you look!
As for the dragons, its not unreasonable to think that these legends came about *because* of dinosaur bones. You can find them in just about any country on Earth (in the right place) and a decent skeleton is rather obviously some kind of giant lizard.
This has been seriously suggested more than once, can't think of a reference off the top of my head though.
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 20:03, archived)
# I just had a look, and appaerently, there ARE werewolves in the Bible!
Couldn't find any vampires, but I wouldn't be too sure.

So, if dragons are dinosaurs we met, what the feck are the werewolves?
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 20:19, archived)
# Cool! Where? Ref?

(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 20:56, archived)
# Key word there
'evidence', as in actual facts and material knowledge, not as in 'made up'.
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:16, archived)
# no, key word would be 'intangible'

(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:21, archived)
# like a kind of "non orange" ?

(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:26, archived)
# yeeeeeeeeeeeeessssssss.....
-ish. But not contradictory to the evidence. You can having something intangible in a museum (a presentation of an idea - like relativity), you can't make up a load of crap and call it science. You need evidence. They have none. End of.
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:39, archived)
# Creationist twats
They send us their books from time to time, it's always hilarious, as if we're going to shelve a book making out Darwin and our scientists are Nazis in a library holding original papers of his.
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:27, archived)
# they are just pining for the old days
when, if you didn't blindly accept "the truth" you would be executed for it

yay!
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:28, archived)
# Check it out:
First edition On the Origin of the species!

It insisted on saying hi to b3ta the other day. £25K and I rested a biscuit tin on it!!
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:35, archived)
# Mmmmmmmmmmmm
Origin.....

I'm surprised it's only worth 25K. One was sold for that about 10 years ago, should have gone up by now!

Incidentally the dullest book I have ever read. It took me 10 years to get past the first 5 pages. Kind of felt I had to, but it is soooo boring.
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:41, archived)
# This copy was rebound in the thirties (I think)
Anyway, that's the copy we let guys like you paw through
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:44, archived)
# that would expalin it....
Still... worth a bob or two.
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 20:01, archived)
# yay
:D

it's so funny that they get their tits in a twist over evolution, you can see it in a human lifetime

there's even a new species of mosquitos in the underground

and wasn't there something about some species of moths developing black spots when the industrial smoggy shit built up and then losing them when the pollution and smog died down in aaaald laandaan town or something like that

oh well, the universe is only 6000 years old HAHAHA twats :)
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:45, archived)
# the moths one has been back and fourth loads....
but it is absolutely dead on. A colossal amount of research has been poured into it and everything fits perfectly. A great piece of science actually.
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:54, archived)
# That's a rather sweeping condemnation
of an entire country's population.
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:47, archived)
# par for the course on here though

(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:49, archived)
# Do you have evidence to support that?

(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:50, archived)
# The evidence is here
in my arsehole.

Here.. look!

*stretches*
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:54, archived)
# That was you?
I thought you looked familiar.
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:59, archived)
# Sweeping... but correct
"seven in 10 Americans continue to believe that Iraq's Saddam Hussein had a role in the attacks"


:P
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:50, archived)
# attacks on what? The dinosaurs?

(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:51, archived)
# Nazis on Dinosaurs!

(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:52, archived)
# It's a sad day indeed when propaganda and diversionary tactics
are used on our own population to confuse and misdirect anger and retribution.

/ worried yank blog.
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:52, archived)
# It's been going on since time immemorial
video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7048572757566726569
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:56, archived)
# *ahem*
sadtypical
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:30, archived)
# Can you give a source for that statistic?
How many were asked?

What question was actually asked?

How widespread, geographically, was the census taken?
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:52, archived)
# I'm not surprised by the outcome
Just disappointed.

Very disappointed.
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:57, archived)
# I am just wondering the validity of the statement
and where it came from.

Statistics are often misrepresented and the misrepresentations are repeated without anyone having a clue what the original data was all about.

This happens at least 68.9% of the time.

I am fairly sure asking people about Saddam Hussein in the shadow of the Creation Museum in Kentucky, would yield completely different data from asking people in Berkeley, CA.

Without a reference for statements like, "7 out of 10 Americans believe...", they mean nothing.
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:01, archived)
# The Washington Post first held the poll
2 years after the attacks. I'm looking for more details...
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:02, archived)
# I got it off the washington post
The article was published in 2003. The exact figure was something like 69%.

I imagine it would be lower now, and I don't think that Americans are on average, any more stupid than any one else
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:05, archived)
# Just more obese
;)
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:07, archived)
# stupid no
uninformed yes
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:08, archived)
# you live there, you should know
www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2003-09-06-poll-iraq_x.htm
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:03, archived)
# I live
in Scotland.
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:04, archived)
# Can you give a source for that statistic?
;)
my bad

edit: if you lived there, you'd know is unfortunately true
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:06, archived)
# Yes
my driving licence has my address on it.

That's how I remember where to go at home time.
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:07, archived)
# do you have a birth certificate to back that up?
Anytime I have to do something official they ask me a copy of my pass (40 pages of high tech anti-couterfeit) AND an authenicated copy of my birth certificate, which is a costly pain in the ass to get but very easy to counterfait.

Do they expect them to be different?
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:11, archived)
# I do have a birth certificate, yes
but it causes a lot of confusion as I was born a woman.
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:15, archived)
# no shit!
I have 2 (two) birth certificats that say I'm a woman. I started being worried but my wife reassured me.
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:17, archived)
# and Scotland lives in you

(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:06, archived)
# and it only gets better
www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=800

REINTRODUCE THE DRAFT!!!!
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:05, archived)
# 8 out of 10 cats prefer whiskas

(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 20:05, archived)
# Round 1 - Fight!

(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:36, archived)
# this
roflclick
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 18:39, archived)
# ahaahha
ahahahahah thats ace, that defo deserves a click, made me laugh my socks off
(, Thu 6 Sep 2007, 19:29, archived)