consider this postulate
arguing on the internet is stupid.

Please refute this claim and provide it context within the history of western philisophical thought in 500 words or more.
( hanke is a cunt but he likes you, Sat 29 Dec 2007, 16:08, archived)

lol, stfu noob.
:)
edit: I felt dirty typing that.
( my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to, Sat 29 Dec 2007, 16:10, archived)

Roffle!

( mediocre mummy feets!, Sat 29 Dec 2007, 16:13, archived)

No it's not, no it's not,
no it's not times 165.
(_Felix ekorrar med brösten, Sat 29 Dec 2007, 16:49, archived)

U R HITLA LOL

( mofaha : standing in the shadows at the end of my bed, Sat 29 Dec 2007, 17:07, archived)

A+
good use of sources.
eloquent.
well structured.
( my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to, Sat 29 Dec 2007, 17:08, archived)