I bought one of these yesterday, they really are great


From the Go Go Scientology challenge. See all 195 entries (closed)

(Duffking, Thu 14 Feb 2008, 17:55, archived)

how is this a positive side to the church?
*am confused*
( HappyToast sorted on, Thu 14 Feb 2008, 17:57, archived)

Oops
I forgot about that

/un compoifies

There has to be a more efficient way to animate stuff than the way I did that though. Duplicating all the layers and fading them in slightly different amounts is a bit tiresome.
(Duffking, Thu 14 Feb 2008, 17:57, archived)

keep it in the comp

you're not the first one to not follow the comps 'guidelines'
( prodigy69 Fuck you, I won't buy what you tell me!, Thu 14 Feb 2008, 18:00, archived)

I think the "positive side" thing
might just be a cover, to distance Rob from the inevitable results.
(_Felix suspicious character from prehistoric caucasus, Thu 14 Feb 2008, 18:04, archived)

This.
Sadly I know nothing about Scientology, have absolutely minimal skillz, and am far too pretentious to have any hummus, because I'd love to have a crack at it and Tom Cruise.

But I'm enjoying the entries when I understand them.
( A Vagabond www.b3ta.com/questions/imagechallenge/post592681, Thu 14 Feb 2008, 18:06, archived)

I thought it was a desperate attempt to simply avoid all the reposts from the Tom Cruise Image Challenge

( HappyToast sorted on, Thu 14 Feb 2008, 18:24, archived)

there are programs that automate such things
but they're generally all quite expensive.

Animation Shop that comes with Paint Shop Pro 9 has a few wobbly effects and you can probably pick that up for a tenner off amazon
( HappyToast sorted on, Thu 14 Feb 2008, 18:26, archived)

Is that about me?

( Pedantichrist twitter.com/LordManley, Thu 14 Feb 2008, 18:09, archived)

You gotta be
sh _____ n' me . . . ;-)
( Valin That that is that . . . is that . . ., Thu 14 Feb 2008, 18:14, archived)

arr.

( Pedantichrist twitter.com/LordManley, Thu 14 Feb 2008, 18:16, archived)