THAT
is infinitely better than the actual film.

TRUE WOO
( Prof UnderCover belligerence aroused by a real or supposed wrong, Tue 8 Jul 2008, 11:57, archived)

Really?
I haven't seen it yet, thought it looked good
( Evilscary off lurking for a bit, Tue 8 Jul 2008, 11:57, archived)

Rest assured
it is utter poo

in fact watching a poo for an hour and half is more fun so go to the park instead and watch some. you can put a smug grin on it and pretend it's Will Smith
( Boff I'm doing this for the Empire, Tue 8 Jul 2008, 12:01, archived)

I personally though it was piss poor
the other three people I was with enjoyed it... two of them are my friends and one is my misses so to say that they are ill educated know nothing dribbling retards who wouldn't know a good film unless I told them would be a harsh thing to say, but the truth is often harsh and cruel.

They are wrong. I am right. This film is shit and I would recommend that you see Wall.E instead... or wait for Batman
( Prof UnderCover belligerence aroused by a real or supposed wrong, Tue 8 Jul 2008, 12:01, archived)

i really want to see wall e
that looks lovely
( Tom O'Bedlam Fuck Boom Rapist, Tue 8 Jul 2008, 12:02, archived)

me too
I've heard its excellent

I liked Ratatouille as well, seems the 'toons have it
( Boff I'm doing this for the Empire, Tue 8 Jul 2008, 12:04, archived)

it will be better than finding nemo
I ALMOST saw it at Glastonbury - but I was otherwise engaged.
( Prof UnderCover belligerence aroused by a real or supposed wrong, Tue 8 Jul 2008, 12:04, archived)

i don't know that it'll be better than monsters inc though

( Tom O'Bedlam Fuck Boom Rapist, Tue 8 Jul 2008, 12:06, archived)

I'm not sure - it might be.
They story will have to be good because everyone has got over the excitement of seeing a rendered 3D animation... also; they've kind of perfected it now - we're out of the honeymoon period where we're wowed by the visuals so the characters and the story need to carry it...
( Prof UnderCover belligerence aroused by a real or supposed wrong, Tue 8 Jul 2008, 12:08, archived)

but pixar have always had a decent story if we ignore Cars

( Tom O'Bedlam Fuck Boom Rapist, Tue 8 Jul 2008, 12:16, archived)

mmmm - I suppose you could make that argument

( Prof UnderCover belligerence aroused by a real or supposed wrong, Tue 8 Jul 2008, 12:24, archived)

Y'see
I just can't get excited about Wall.E. There must be some fantastic premise that I'm just not understanding.

I have no doubt the visuals will be spectacular and Wall.E will be a sickeningly cute character but I've not heard anything about the story which makes me want to see it.

Same with Ratatouille.
( Joliet has some fucking Jaffa Cakes in her coat pocket!, Tue 8 Jul 2008, 12:03, archived)

I thought ratatouille was poor, very poor
even by Disney's standards. If you're in the mood for a slushy American version of how stories will be told I think Wall.E will probably be funny... and it covers the topic of what the Earth is like when the Humans have gone... but it will be a Disney film and so racist.
( Prof UnderCover belligerence aroused by a real or supposed wrong, Tue 8 Jul 2008, 12:06, archived)

I liked Ratatouille
Although I can't put my finger on why really
( Evilscary off lurking for a bit, Tue 8 Jul 2008, 12:08, archived)

you got a blowjob while you were watching it
... is the only thing I can think of.
( Prof UnderCover belligerence aroused by a real or supposed wrong, Tue 8 Jul 2008, 12:08, archived)

I liked it
and the last blow job i got was in the winter of '92 unless sheep count
( Boff I'm doing this for the Empire, Tue 8 Jul 2008, 12:13, archived)

zzzzzzz

( Prof UnderCover belligerence aroused by a real or supposed wrong, Tue 8 Jul 2008, 12:14, archived)

seconded
I thought Ratatouille was great, best disney film I've seen in ages
( Finite appears to be falling apart, Tue 8 Jul 2008, 12:19, archived)