my response exactly
*may have been subliminaly influenced by your response*
( ,
Fri 18 Jul 2008, 0:54,
archived)
spackalicious
i just....
WOOWWW..
*drools*
edit: the odd thing about this:
during the first few loops when my left and right brains were trying to sort this thing out -- one quick way of coping with it was that I initially thought that that the colors were switching around. odd
( ,
Fri 18 Jul 2008, 0:55,
archived)
WOOWWW..
*drools*
edit: the odd thing about this:
during the first few loops when my left and right brains were trying to sort this thing out -- one quick way of coping with it was that I initially thought that that the colors were switching around. odd
Fuck!
I'm having Salvia Divinorum flashbacks!
I feel all uneasy...
( ,
Fri 18 Jul 2008, 0:56,
archived)
I feel all uneasy...
Aaah!
So I am. Bloody hell! 5 flipping years. I remember when this was all fields and Beattie.
( ,
Fri 18 Jul 2008, 1:11,
archived)
Fucking ace!
Just as I repair my brain, you post that and break it again.
:-P
( ,
Fri 18 Jul 2008, 1:17,
archived)
:-P
That is so cool
it took me ages to grasp staring at it any longer was pointless
Without saying a healthy click is in order
( ,
Fri 18 Jul 2008, 1:18,
archived)
Without saying a healthy click is in order
never underestimate
the bandwidth capacity of a lorry full of backup tapes
( ,
Fri 18 Jul 2008, 1:30,
archived)
I reckon a truck full of DAT tapes could hold about 156 petabytes.
Hella bad latency though. I guess the actual bandwidth depends on how many trucks can arrive per second.
If they arrive at the rate of one per hour, the bandwidth of a big truck is 347 Terabits per second, or 347,000,000 Mbit/s.
Downloading all the data in the world this way (or at least all the data in the world in 2006, according to the New York Times) would take a month and a half.
( ,
Fri 18 Jul 2008, 1:44,
archived)
If they arrive at the rate of one per hour, the bandwidth of a big truck is 347 Terabits per second, or 347,000,000 Mbit/s.
Downloading all the data in the world this way (or at least all the data in the world in 2006, according to the New York Times) would take a month and a half.