Look, I'm playing nice as the FAQ itself recommends
There's not 'fuck all wrong with it', but it's not worth getting bitchy about either.
Just a pleasant and friendly word that it's preffered if it's a little smaller and preffereably under the filesize is all that was needed.

Some of us here are on a capped amount of bandwith and every little bit helps.
( Quijibo Esq. BSc. May contain traces of nuts, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:28, archived)

you are, yes, but Evilscary seems to be venting a bit
chillax or I'll write a goodbye letter to the internet
(k3b/-\b Peace man., Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:31, archived)

show me where in the faq it says about Image dimensions

then go tell that fucknut Dr.Dyslexia about it :)xxx
( prodigy69 uncle 2.0, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:31, archived)

there is
As far as pixel size goes there is no real limit, but you will rarely need to make your image larger than 400 pixels wide. To be put on the frontpage, your image needs to be no wider than 280 pixels.
(k3b/-\b Peace man., Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:33, archived)

you know what to do!!!

GO GO GO!!!
( prodigy69 uncle 2.0, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:36, archived)

oh! doc dys!
I'll tell her (him) later
(k3b/-\b Peace man., Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:52, archived)

doen't that mean
that it's alright in the rare occasion you need to post an image larger than 400px, say of a modified screenshot?
(Your watch is still saving for 5K but has learnt about 'nose bondage', Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:57, archived)

Heh.
Well it's mainly common sense that it'd be nice if it fits on an 800x600 screen (I think it may just about as it is now, but it's fairly close).

Dyslexia gets away with it for being persistant, it would seem.
( Quijibo Esq. BSc. May contain traces of nuts, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:34, archived)

dyslexia gets away with it because he mainly posts in the gayshift.

( Barbarossa, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:35, archived)

Ah yes.

( Quijibo Esq. BSc. May contain traces of nuts, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:37, archived)

thank fuck.

( prodigy69 uncle 2.0, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:37, archived)

a much more civilised time of day, where a 769 pixel wide picture doesn't cause half the board to have a sudden rectal prolapse.

( Cockweasle orson wezl, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:50, archived)

what is this 800x600 screen?
the 90's?
(k3b/-\b Peace man., Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:37, archived)

^ haha

comp it...it's a Recession
( prodigy69 uncle 2.0, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:39, archived)

BAM!! DONE! :)

(k3b/-\b Peace man., Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:53, archived)

Heh.
It's not me, no. However, I am a web developer and I'm still astonished to see how many people are viewing the web on 800x600 res.
( Quijibo Esq. BSc. May contain traces of nuts, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:39, archived)

This is true

( Barbarossa, Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:43, archived)

*shrug*
I can't help if people are thickos!
(k3b/-\b Peace man., Thu 7 Aug 2008, 11:53, archived)