b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 9761856

# I wondered what he was drawing...

(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 13:32, archived)
# hahahahahhahahaha! *office lol*
*click!!!*
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 13:32, archived)
# pffft!
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 13:32, archived)
# "EMERGENCY HITLER! SAVE ME!"
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 13:32, archived)
# Hahahahaha
To recap then, so far we have:
Evil Hitler
Comedy Hitler, and now
Emergency Hitler.
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 13:59, archived)
# Ha ha ha
very good
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 13:33, archived)
# ARF!
This is ace!
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 13:35, archived)
# HAHAHAHAHA
This contains well over the win RDA.
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 13:35, archived)
# CAUTION: an excess of win in your diet can lead to cancer of the funnies.
It is recommended that you do not ingest more than 5 megalols of hummus a day.
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 13:38, archived)
# LOL
A MAN DID A THING. PEOPLE ARE ANGRY.
:D
*click*
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 13:36, archived)
# hahaha

(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 13:37, archived)
# nice!
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 13:39, archived)
# brilliant
clicks
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 13:40, archived)
# Ha ha ha ha ha ha!
Excellent! You're on top form today sir!
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 13:44, archived)
# HA! This is Ace.
*clicktiems*
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 13:46, archived)
# Hahaha
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 13:59, archived)
# Proper special.
:D
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 14:09, archived)
# "Look...I'm Hitler!...Hee hee!"
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 14:13, archived)
# Uber Clicken
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 14:34, archived)
# Prepare for stage 2
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 14:39, archived)
# Hahahaha!!
FP this now!
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 14:47, archived)
# hahahaha, etc
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 15:09, archived)
# Hahahaha
(, Fri 23 Oct 2009, 15:34, archived)
# Hahaha
Woo
(, Sat 24 Oct 2009, 10:40, archived)
# Hahaha & a dash of Pffft *cleek*
Did anyone else notice his bottom lip protruding on frequent basis? Lacist weirdo.
(, Sat 24 Oct 2009, 10:53, archived)
#
More BNP bashing - sure Nick Griffin says some stupid things but at least he's not afraid to say it like it is - the UK is quickly becoming a foreign land for the indigenous white British - walking down my high street is like walking down downtown Baghdad sometimes and nobody in this country seems to want to anything about the floods of illegal immigrants flooding this country and ripping off the benefits system. Maybe when the do-gooders and bleeding hearts are getting robbed and stabbed by a group of illegal immigrants their opinions may change - but it'll already be too late for the country by then...
(, Sat 24 Oct 2009, 15:48, archived)
# Good.
I hope that does all happen, just to make you even more bad tempered.

"robbed and stabbed by a group of illegal immigrants" - do you ever question that you might be living in a paranoid fantasy world?

I'm assuming that you didn't even watch the show, otherwise you'd be aware what a ridiculous phrase "indigenous white British" is.

Go and read a book*



*A proper well researched one, not just Littlejohn's Britain
(, Sat 24 Oct 2009, 16:34, archived)
#
Well yeah, I kind of hope it does happen too, the looks on the faces of people like you who have lived in delusional denial for years would be worth it.

I didn't watch the show no - I knew the audience would be rigged and it would be reduced to a BNP bashing farce. But look at the news - apparently a lot of people have said they agreed with the things Nick Griffin said after it aired - so a good result I think.

"go and read a book" - lots of them, any particular one?
(, Sun 25 Oct 2009, 11:49, archived)
# This one might teach you something
(, Sun 25 Oct 2009, 12:12, archived)
# I can certainly understand the fear of foreigners in the streets
Sure, they say they're there to work low-paying jobs he middle clas doesn't want, but does history bear that out?

After all, look at what the British did to the native peoples of India, Australia, the Americas, China, &tc. when they came into the countries in droves, usually illegally and unbidden.

These people are trying to take over Britain, the same as Britain took over their lands!

(end lunatic rant here)
(, Sat 24 Oct 2009, 16:53, archived)
#
Yeah but England contributed to and improved your countries - what contributions and improvements have millions of immigrants made to the UK? Apart from filling our jails and jamming up the NHS absolutely nothing.
(, Sun 25 Oct 2009, 11:54, archived)
#
"jamming up the NHS" with doctors and nurses?
What contributions have white people made to this island in recent years, would you say?
(, Sun 25 Oct 2009, 12:10, archived)
#
I guess you could say they were jamming up the NHS with doctors - BOGUS doctors with fake credentials who misdiagnose patients.

(, Sun 25 Oct 2009, 12:31, archived)
#
You make bold statements but never provide any evidence. Links please.
(, Sun 25 Oct 2009, 12:34, archived)
# The problem lies not with immigrants
but with the benefits system itself. A rich country like the UK can afford a degree of social welfare for legitimate refugees. It should not enable them to manipulate the lucrative complexities of the system though. That applies to British citizens too.

Seeing lots of 'illegal immigrants' walking down your high street is a symptom of the real problem of Britain's bureaucratic mire. Don't blame immigrants for trying to exploit it; if you were in the same situation as them, I bet you'd do it too.
(, Sat 24 Oct 2009, 17:25, archived)
#
How many countries do these immigrants pass through to get to this allegedly "rich country" The reason they come here is because they know immigration is largely unchecked and that if they 'lose' their passports they can't be deported.

If they were genuine asylum seekers they should be claiming asylum in the closest country. They come here for the free handouts and a lax system that suits their penchance for lying and thieving.
(, Sun 25 Oct 2009, 12:02, archived)
#
"their penchance for lying and thieving" - genetic evidence please.
"if they 'lose' their passports they can't be deported" - legal evidence please.
(, Sun 25 Oct 2009, 12:20, archived)
# well, technically....
"their penchant for lying and thieving" - evidence: they're human. Case closed.

"if they 'lose' their passports, they can't be deported" - evidence: not true in and of itself, but part of something which is actually true. If an immigrant claims to be from somewhere with an appauling human rights regeime, and the authorities can't prove that they're actually from somewhere else, they cannot be deported. Bit of a hard one - obviously, we wouldn't want to send anyone back somewhere where they'd be instantly horribled to death, but it's an easy one to abuse, and people have clocked onto this fact.
(, Mon 26 Oct 2009, 22:47, archived)
# Would lack of local knowledge
and the wrong accent not make it very hard to lie about where you come from, though?
(, Tue 27 Oct 2009, 14:19, archived)
# from what I gather, no
but I don't work in that area. My limited familiarity with the subject comes only from knowing somebody who works with the people who deal with this kind of thing.

However, I don't suppose that the immigration services keep an expert on every conceivable country on the books, just on the offchance that someone might claim to be from there. I would imagine they'd count themselves fairly fortunate if they could find a translator...

(, Wed 28 Oct 2009, 1:53, archived)
# .
Firstly, illegal immigrants are unable to register for benefits, seeing as you are required to present proof of british citizenship when you claim. Secondly, as someone else pointed out, the concept of an 'indigenous' white Briton is a myth, you just need to look at our language and place names to see that. Do you like beef? French. Sunday? Viking/Norse. Place names ending in -chester? Roman. Morris Dancing? Turkish, via Islamic Spain. Thirdly, the BNP frequently invent fictions to justify their racism - note the recent 'murders-that-weren't'.

I understand people's disillusionment with the political establishment and it's failiure to act upon the public's concerns upon the scale of immigration - but a party who's raison d'etre is a bigoted lie and who campaign by pandering to peoples basest fears and errecting scapegoats are not the kind of people to be trusted either.

P.S. Nice work on the FP! :)
(, Sat 24 Oct 2009, 23:24, archived)
#
Ok fair point - illegal immigrants may not be entitled to benefits but they make their money one way or the other - probably through flogging their food vouchers and working illegally. I think this site is obviously popular with the student types who like to think they are politically correct by defending immigrants. The vast majority of the crowd who were protesting at the BBC seemed comprised of the workshy student fraternity - doing their student bit. Pathetic. So what if Great Britain invaded other countries - at least we improved them. What good are the scum who are flooding into this country?

More and more mosques are appearing in this country now - would islamic countries allow churches to be built in their country? Hell no - it would be burnt to the ground. There are large parts of cities in this country that are now totally muslim - places where white british people refuse to go for fear of being attacked simply because they are not muslim. Muslims aren't interested in intergration - they want to force non-muslims to islam - any fool can see what is happening all around the world now - it's not just here and there, it's everywhere where there are muslims. We've now got muslims in this country screaming for sharia law and in certain courts they are even covertly allowing it - we've got schools secretly feeding children halal meat at the demand of the muslim parents (the schools didn't bother asking the non-muslim children's parents whether they wanted their kids to eat halal meat though)

Now you can call me paranoid,loony racist whatever - mark my words there will be serious problems in this country very soon if nothing is done to check the level of illegal immigrants and bogus claims for student visas and asylum - this is an island ffs, there is only a finite amount of space.

I wish there was an alternative to the BNP but politicians are terrified of appearing racist if they so much as raise the issue of illegal immigration.

I see it day in and day out where I work - non-whites taking the piss out of the system. They are prolific liars, provide false information and pay for nothing. And if they are cornered they scream racial abuse or 'you're only doing this because I'm black'

I'm sick of white britsh people getting the shaft by their own government in favour of foreigners who have contributed squat to this country.

End of racist rant.
(, Sun 25 Oct 2009, 11:41, archived)
#
Overpopulation is as much caused by people having too many children as from immigration. Why not get as angry with couples who have more than 2 kids?

Overpopulation (global, rather than local) is a serious future concern, the colour of the future population really should not be.

The fact that you say "non-whites" rather than immigrants, suggests that your argument *is* based upon pure racism. There are presumably far more white British people ripping off the benefits system, so why do you focus all the blame on any immigrants who do that (and suggest they ALL do which is a racist generalisation).

I get the impression that you refer to all muslims as "illegal immigrants" whether they are or not. (And having met people with similar opinions to you before, probably refer to all asian people as muslim whether they are or not)

"So what if Great Britain invaded other countries - at least we improved them." - please qualify what you mean by "improved". You mean like the genocide of the Tasmanian Aboriginies?
(, Sun 25 Oct 2009, 12:08, archived)
#
Well, I would hardly call the 118 Tasmanian Aborigines that were directly killed by the British a genocide...



(, Sun 25 Oct 2009, 12:27, archived)
# The British were ultimately
(deliberately or not) responsible for the end of their genetic line. What would you call it? And, that's beside the point - my question was how did we improve these countries?
(, Sun 25 Oct 2009, 12:37, archived)
#
"There are large parts of cities in this country that are now totally muslim - places where white british people refuse to go for fear of being attacked simply because they are not muslim." - Google Maps link please
(, Sun 25 Oct 2009, 12:26, archived)
# six of one, half dozen of the other

being Asian doesn't exclude you from being a racist, or a thug -

www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today/reports/archive/politics/oldham1.shtml

I would imagine they have the same proportion of knuckle-draggers as any other ethnic grouping, our lot included.
(, Wed 28 Oct 2009, 1:59, archived)
# I think that often things like that are more down to poverty than race.
Certainly when I lived in Bradford, the "no go asian areas" you'd be told of had basically the same quality of life as the "no go areas" in other places where race wasn't mentioned because they were predominantly white. Usually places where you can understand people being frustrated by the bad hand they have, and thus may express this frustration with violence.

Likewise, is the attitude of those gangs (asian and white) all that different to football hooligans who choose who to attack by what team they support? It looks like people who are seeking out violence for the sake of violence and have chosen a 'team' by a random thing that separates them.

When it comes down to race, sadly it's going to be a case of violence breeding violence since the violence of the other side is going to create the "proof" that the two can't live side by side which, unquestioned, will make it ingrained.

It seems quite ironic that white racists and asian racists don't realise that they have more in common with each other than with the group they choose to assign themselves with.
(, Wed 28 Oct 2009, 13:29, archived)
# Indeed
People are quite reliable in this regard. If there's a problem, blame other groups, in descending order of difference from yourself - and pray the problem miraculously disappears before you're left on your own, having to take a long, hard look inside...

But, on the plus side, any species which can invent cheesecake cannot be all bad.
(, Thu 29 Oct 2009, 0:24, archived)
# It's cool to be PC to defend immigrants?
No, I just dislike people being liberal with the truth to justify their bigotry. Unless you can provide a source to independent, rigorous research or jounalism to back up each and every one of your claims - you ARE being paranoid. For example, do you actually know how many local authority (social) housing tennants are immigrants? I'll help you out - it's only 1.8% of the total, i.e. 98.2% of social housing is allocated to British Citizens. [ECHR, July 2009]

Also, regarding 'workshy' students. When I was at uni, I frequently worked over 100 hours a week, occasionaly found the time for part-time jobs, ran a sports club for the SU, and when I felt passionate about something political I would get involved. Pretty fucking full on actually, and most of my friends were similarly hard-working. Although I disagree with the censorship that UAF proposed on thursday, political demonstrations like that are to be celebrated - because these are young people who are interested in their country and how it is run. And that is NOT pathetic.
(, Sun 25 Oct 2009, 15:00, archived)
# a matter of colour?
not so much -

www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2009/03/19/x-factor-emma-chawner-s-83st-family-s-too-fat-to-work-and-too-busy-watching-tv-to-diet-115875-21209579/

(sorry, it's the Mirror - first result google gave me)

Compare these slobs to an immigrant (gasp!) who happens to work all the hours god sends in our national health service. I met a few last time I was in hospital. Couple of Africans, and a malasian, as I recall - all of them lovely people, all working more hours than I do.
(, Mon 26 Oct 2009, 23:01, archived)
# Without getting too drawn into all of this....

One would measure the indigenuity/indigenousness/indignancy (fuck knows, can't be bothered to check) of the a population via their DNA - not their habits, customs, and language.

Oddly enough, studies have in fact been done to this end - and found that successive waves of immigrants (Romans, Saxons, Vikings, Normans, and so on) have made far less of a dent in the original 'British' gene-pool than anyone had expected.

I'm not making any sort of political point, it just struck me as interesting...
(, Mon 26 Oct 2009, 22:31, archived)
# You, sir...
...are either a genuine success as a troll or a genuine failure as a human being. Either way, you're in for years of disappointment if you think the BNP are going anywhere important.
(, Sun 25 Oct 2009, 17:17, archived)
# Swastika.

Quality post. Congrats on FP.
It has stirred up a wasp's's,s nest.
I'm not normaly a pedant but......
Swastika is clockwise, it should be anti-clockwise.

I'm sure somebody will explain why.
(, Sun 25 Oct 2009, 16:53, archived)
# Because...
...it's more racially pure that way round.

Obviously.
(, Sun 25 Oct 2009, 17:18, archived)
# Swastika
Agreed, the left facing swastika used here is not correct, it was right facing instead

Ironically and traditionally (it still applies in many eastern religions)

Left Facing swastika, is an omen, bad sign, sign of evil; etc.

Right facing swastika (as used ala Nazi) is the opposite, quite a positive sign

Some religions however have since abolished the symbol, or switched it over so the right facing swastikka is now bad; to fit in with the whole evil Nazi connotation.... Ahhhh adaptive religion... Do what we say, until we tell you it's all wrong, then listen to what we say instead or bad things will happen to you...

There I've saved you from pedancy Unklian by being more of one myself :P
(, Mon 26 Oct 2009, 10:16, archived)
# not quite true...

in fact, the two were largely interchangeable. I read a very interesting article on it, somewhere - if you're particularly excited about the topic, I'll dig it out.

But in any event - I'd much rather have adaptive religions than those which reject any form of change. Gay priests/women bishops/whatever else? Why the fuck not. If they want to be religious, fine - at least they're doing it with a modern slant. Got to be preferable to the inflexible ones that would condemn us to life in the dark ages...
(, Mon 26 Oct 2009, 22:35, archived)
# Thanks
Would be interested if you can dig it up :)

Agree with you on the adaptive over inflexible, don't think i worded my post to well :)
(, Wed 28 Oct 2009, 23:27, archived)
# can't find the one I read
but have this one instead:

www.straightdope.com/columns/read/440/was-the-swastika-actually-an-old-native-american-symbol

nb: if you've not visited thestraightdope before, prepare to lose some hours.
(, Thu 29 Oct 2009, 0:27, archived)
# Many thanks!
Just started reading the article, and i can see from the rest of the site, you're right I'm about to lost some hours :) It looks pretty interesting :D

+Scurries off to computer cave with 2-litre bottled water and piss-pot+
(, Thu 29 Oct 2009, 22:57, archived)