b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Make Art More Awesome » Message 9970414

[challenge entry] starry trek night

set your blasters to meow

From the Make Art More Awesome challenge. See all 735 entries (closed)

(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:01, archived)
# i don't remember the enterprise having kitten torpedos
damn upgrades, always something mew!
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:03, archived)
[challenge entry] Fucking space people going round drugging the sky!
may I pea this please?

(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:04, archived)
# Needs more lens flare
God that movie was a piece of sh*t
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:04, archived)
# you, me and two other people are the only people who seem to think so
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:05, archived)
# *high fives*
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:08, archived)
# I heartily agree, too. Seriously crap film: weak plot, crap acting, and LENS FLARES!
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:12, archived)
# the entire film seemed to be based around "right we need these characters with these catchphrases, how can we crowbar a plot around that?"
even the final black hole set piece just seemed to be the an excuse for Scotty to say "the engines cannae take it anymore"

a sad reboot of one of my favourite franchises
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:17, archived)
# More like "Roddenberry's pegged out now, so we can take his life's work and vision and trample roughshod over it in the pursuit of a quick bit of cash"
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:19, archived)
# a sad truth.
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:21, archived)
# *cough*
Paramount's Standard Business Plan *cough*
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:23, archived)
# I know
To this day I can't believe that I am actually surprised that's how it turned out...
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:27, archived)
# ^THIS!!
I can't say I am the biggest star trek fan, I like the show enough to watch it from time to time, but that film was bad enough to piss me off.
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:23, archived)
# Meh. It was kind of average.
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:17, archived)
# More Lens Flare, you say?

(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:08, archived)
# Hahahaha
film's still sh*t though
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:09, archived)
# I only added a *tiny* bit of extra onto that, ironically.
;-)
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:11, archived)
# I'm beginning to think JJ Abrams has a fetish for lens flare
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:10, archived)
# You might be right there...
:)
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:11, archived)
# IT'S TRUE!
90% of his shots seem to have some kind of photoshop lighting effect.
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 19:02, archived)
# not quite enough...
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:11, archived)
# Hahahahhahahaaha
*office lols*
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:11, archived)
# *LOL*
That's more like it!
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:12, archived)
# hahahahahahha!
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:13, archived)
# 8D
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:14, archived)
# argh!
fuck my eyes
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:17, archived)
# i don't want to!
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:19, archived)
# hahah...
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:42, archived)
# hahaha yeah I did that too :)
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:11, archived)
#
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:12, archived)
# Nice one, Tom.
:D
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:12, archived)
# Woo
Pssst, your click for big link not worky
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:04, archived)
# 'Load the Neutron Kittens, Mr Chekov'
:)
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 16:10, archived)