b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Make Art More Awesome » Message 9971101

[challenge entry] cubism

From the Make Art More Awesome challenge. See all 735 entries (closed)

(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 21:57, archived)
# Whoa there
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 21:59, archived)
# It /might/ be cubism.
edit: Hah. Count on _Felix to elevate the discussion to philosophy :)

(Of course, you are all imaginary people, by the way, I hope that you know this...)
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:01, archived)
# Although having said that, this sentence (attributed to David Deutsch):
"David Deutsch says that flowers are beautiful because they communicate accross a genetic gap,"

Is such astonishing bullshit, that I can't even begin to explain how stupid it is.
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:10, archived)
# Who the fuck is this David Deutsch, anyway?
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:11, archived)
# Haha, what a post that is.
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:02, archived)
# I think I remember that thread
pages and pages of art school argument over what cubism is.

Possibly the most highbrow discussion I've ever witnessed on /board
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:04, archived)
# Haha from where I was sitting
it looked more like a casual tourist falling into a shark pool.
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:10, archived)
# Also, someone in that thread was pimping his nodes...
node pimp!
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:14, archived)
# Disgraceful :)
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:21, archived)
# Boo :(
I've discussed about whether Lagrangians are covariant or not, the physicality of a non-covariant Lagrangian (of course it has one; if it didn't the whole of effective field theory would be pretty suspect), and something of the inner workings of acoustic black holes. I thought that was pretty highbrow.

Then again, you probably didn't see it.
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:15, archived)
# Was that discussion with Moon Unit Technologies? :)
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:19, archived)
# Very possibly, yes
Indeed I think it probably was.
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:49, archived)
# I can't say it's stuck in my mind
so you're probably right. I didn't see it.
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:20, archived)
# That or it bored you rigid
Both are entirely possible.
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:51, archived)
# I was involved in a two-person economics pun thread once.
I think I win.
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:29, archived)
# That is pretty superior. Chemistry discussions would probably be pretty boring.
Although there was a documentary on last night about chemistry where I learned about the first guy to draw a chemical bond as a line on a page (he was Scottish!).
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:32, archived)
# Mine wasn't a chemistry discussion!
:( Mine was about quantum physics and field theories and condensed matter and, specifically, acoustic black holes which are exactly what they say, black holes for sound.

I'm going to go and sulk* now.




* Sleep, I get up in six hours to go to an airport. I love** flying.

** Fucking loathe


Edit: Also I actually agree, chemistry discussions *would* be pretty dull. Then again, so would theoretical physics ones, I guess, so I'm actually no better than you. I really am going to bed now.
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:51, archived)
# That second one is a rather hefty thread haha!
I scanned over it really fast, love how it starts with talk of cubism/coconut crabs and bounty bars only to end at "beano art".
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:08, archived)
# I miss connor :(
 
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:14, archived)
# He's still around from time to time
and he still posts on tumblr
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:19, archived)
# Yeah
He's become more of a rare luxury, though.
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:25, archived)
# that was ace :)
Some of my favourite b3ta conversations have been late night arguments with _felix
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:18, archived)
# Squared away !
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:00, archived)
# Someones been wearing mondrian specs!!
(, Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:07, archived)