i read that that's why they booted himbut did it ever get proved?
edit: i also read a back story about how he'd set up the camera. his claim wasn' that it was a lucky snap, but that he'd seen wolf activity and put a sensor triggered camera in place overnight or something. I'm not disputing either story, i'm genuinely curious whether it got proven
(edit: i also read a back story about how he'd set up the camera. his claim wasn' that it was a lucky snap, but that he'd seen wolf activity and put a sensor triggered camera in place overnight or something. I'm not disputing either story, i'm genuinely curious whether it got proven
mictoboy shitting in your cunt since,
Tue 23 Mar 2010, 22:10,
archived)
"The organisers were alerted to suspicions about the image by Spanish photographers who recognised the wolf and the location as the Cañada Real wildlife park. Wolf experts also questioned why the wolf would jump the gate when a wild animal was more likely to squeeze between the bars.
The judges said they asked Rodriguez for corroboration of his story and if there was anyone who could act as a witness to back him up, but his answers were inadequate."
(The judges said they asked Rodriguez for corroboration of his story and if there was anyone who could act as a witness to back him up, but his answers were inadequate."
Tribs 🦇 ↓ dn ʎɐʍ sᴉɥʇ ↓🦇,
Tue 23 Mar 2010, 22:14,
archived)
I believe so, but am to tired to have a go at the web to find outbasically even the first pro I bumped into and mentioned the subject said it was quite obviously bollocks
Second year that bunch have fucked up, remember the camera trap of the snow leopard?
(Second year that bunch have fucked up, remember the camera trap of the snow leopard?
Jahled Three shades of black,
Tue 23 Mar 2010, 22:14,
archived)