Home » Image Challenge » If Band Names Were Taken Literally
[Suggest a different challenge]
If Band Names Were Taken Literally (This challenge is now closed)

What would a Def Leppard look like? Are the Sugababes actually made out of sugar? Show us literal interpretations of band names.
(, Wed 12 Dec 2007, 19:57)
The trouble with arriving at the Image Challenge at such a late stage...
(, Sun 16 Dec 2007, 19:00, More)
Come to think of it, it's almost inconceivable that this hasn't bindun. And better.
But after all those seconds slaving meticulously over Photoshop, I'm bloody well posting it anyway.
(, Sun 16 Dec 2007, 18:09, More)
There gonna send me to the Tower of London for this

but i don't care.
source
(, Sun 16 Dec 2007, 18:02, More)
This one's a little tenuous.
So if you don't get it, have a crack at my other ones first.
Here..
..here..
..and here
(, Sun 16 Dec 2007, 14:42, More)
I honestly don't think this will get me any points in the slightest

Click for bigger (126KB)
(, Sun 16 Dec 2007, 14:10, More)

What would a Def Leppard look like? Are the Sugababes actually made out of sugar? Show us literal interpretations of band names.
(, Wed 12 Dec 2007, 19:57)
Pages: 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 (or see the popular posts)
(, Sun 16 Dec 2007, 19:00, More)
But after all those seconds slaving meticulously over Photoshop, I'm bloody well posting it anyway.
(, Sun 16 Dec 2007, 18:09, More)

but i don't care.
source
(, Sun 16 Dec 2007, 18:02, More)
So if you don't get it, have a crack at my other ones first.
Here..
..here..
..and here
(, Sun 16 Dec 2007, 14:42, More)
Click for bigger (126KB)
(, Sun 16 Dec 2007, 14:10, More)








