When A Rocket Ship Explodes, And Everybody Still Wants To Fly..
Remember the Antares Rocket launch fail? Here's the cameras from the launch pad.
When watching, think of the camera men's families.
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 18:02, Share, Reply)
Remember the Antares Rocket launch fail? Here's the cameras from the launch pad.
When watching, think of the camera men's families.
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 18:02, Share, Reply)
The cameramen had to go sweep up the mess
Then the wives had to clean the stained uniforms.
Meaning the children didn't get to go to the park.
Will that do?
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 18:21, Share, Reply)
Then the wives had to clean the stained uniforms.
Meaning the children didn't get to go to the park.
Will that do?
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 18:21, Share, Reply)
Yes.
I'd like to see the remote cameras where the scientists that spent years building, and $Millions building it, watch it. I wonder what they do next. Pub?
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 18:26, Share, Reply)
I'd like to see the remote cameras where the scientists that spent years building, and $Millions building it, watch it. I wonder what they do next. Pub?
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 18:26, Share, Reply)
are you suggesting a new type of Gogglebox?
channel 5 might be interested
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 18:51, Share, Reply)
channel 5 might be interested
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 18:51, Share, Reply)
No
The new version of Gogglebox is real people watching and commenting on Gogglebox. I'm really surprised they haven't done this yet.
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 20:10, Share, Reply)
The new version of Gogglebox is real people watching and commenting on Gogglebox. I'm really surprised they haven't done this yet.
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 20:10, Share, Reply)
The one last month?
"no injuries from the explosion itself"
and
"To guard against the dangers of a failed launch the Nasa facility maintains a hazard area of about 1,400 square miles around the site"
Both from: www.theguardian.com/science/2014/oct/28/antares-rocket-explodes-nasa-launch-pad-orbital-science
Unless your referring to a different Antares rocket fail, no-one was injured, and the cameras would have been remote as point out^
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 18:24, Share, Reply)
"no injuries from the explosion itself"
and
"To guard against the dangers of a failed launch the Nasa facility maintains a hazard area of about 1,400 square miles around the site"
Both from: www.theguardian.com/science/2014/oct/28/antares-rocket-explodes-nasa-launch-pad-orbital-science
Unless your referring to a different Antares rocket fail, no-one was injured, and the cameras would have been remote as point out^
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 18:24, Share, Reply)
Yes
This footage shows it from more angles, including loads of wizzy twirly bits : youtu.be/BSr4hUcROwo?t=3m57s
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 18:28, Share, Reply)
This footage shows it from more angles, including loads of wizzy twirly bits : youtu.be/BSr4hUcROwo?t=3m57s
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 18:28, Share, Reply)
It did not autodestruct before hitting the ground...
Major fail there...
(And how did I survive without full screen HD)
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 19:15, Share, Reply)
Major fail there...
(And how did I survive without full screen HD)
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 19:15, Share, Reply)
2002 - no one died
2003 - no one died
2004 - no one died
2005 - someone died
2006 - no one died
...
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 20:14, Share, Reply)
Here's a Russian Soyuz launch from last week for comparison
Thats' about 150m away from the pad.
In former Soviet Russia monohydrazine eats you!
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 22:42, Share, Reply)
Thats' about 150m away from the pad.
In former Soviet Russia monohydrazine eats you!
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 22:42, Share, Reply)
Big badda-boom!
All those cameras and none of them had a filter on to monitor the rocket exhausts?
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 20:43, Share, Reply)
All those cameras and none of them had a filter on to monitor the rocket exhausts?
( , Wed 26 Nov 2014, 20:43, Share, Reply)