Hmm
In fairness, if his campaign has lost congress for the republicans he'll be effectively neutered and spend the next four years disappointing his angry mob and tweeting self-aggrandising nonsense.
But where exactly is Clinton's corruption? - she and her husband have been under the spotlight since 1992 and the worst there has ever been pinned on either of them is Bill had a BJ in the oval office. And it isn't like he's the first president to have had that.
If she is corrupt and repeated ad nauseum inquiries have failed to pin jack shit on her, she'd making a fucking awesome president.
(
The Ann Coulter Fan Club Babylon is burning at, Wed 26 Oct 2016, 18:43,
Share,
Reply)
She and Bill have been incredibly astute. There has probably not been their equal since the Borgias.
And if they weren't so blatant about it, people likely wouldn't get bothered. The US has been big into Sunshine Laws, which require transparency to ostensibly prevent corruption. The whole email thing, was just one way to get around such laws - and they are federal laws.
It then ties into the pay-for-play for Bill's foundation: did they trade favors for contributions? There is a great deal of circumstantial evidence, and then the Wikileaks stuff. When you delete tens of thousands of emails of a non-secured account, when by law you shouldn't have said account, it raises a lot of questions.
If they are innocent of it all, they really made their life so much worse by choosing their own convenience (and arrogance) over the relative simplicity of following pretty basic rules.
(
BrokenCoccyx doesn't mind if you grope on, Wed 26 Oct 2016, 18:52,
Share,
Reply)
You've got a pumpkin for an icon
And we bats are building a wall to keep you bad hombres out.
(
The Ann Coulter Fan Club Babylon is burning at, Wed 26 Oct 2016, 19:01,
Share,
Reply)
PS
the pumpkins are paying for it.
(
The Ann Coulter Fan Club Babylon is burning at, Wed 26 Oct 2016, 19:02,
Share,
Reply)
I don't want to intrude on this debate but I think it's abundantly clear that Trump has a track record of supporting pumpkins
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Wed 26 Oct 2016, 21:37,
Share,
Reply)
It's interesting that Wikileaks has been conducting a campaign to try to smear Clinton,
with the kind of evidence which might usually scupper a presidential candidate's chances, and it has all just bounced off because only people voting for Trump actually care about that.
Because clearly very few people are actually FOR Clinton, they're mostly just against Trump.
She could probably kick a puppy live on CNN stating "I'm only doing this to see if most of you still hate Trump more than me!" and she'd still be better presidential material than Trump.
(, Wed 26 Oct 2016, 21:14, Share, Reply)
I've always thought that had Assange and Snowden done the exact same thing under GW Bush or any other republican president they'd be hailed as heroes.
(
BrokenCoccyx doesn't mind if you grope on, Wed 26 Oct 2016, 21:39,
Share,
Reply)
