reminds me of this
of course Feynman, being a genius, doesn't get upset and instead shows how pointless the question itself is, by elegantly expressing the fundamental truth of the matter
www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO0r930Sn_8
.
( , Fri 9 Dec 2016, 9:59, Share, Reply)
of course Feynman, being a genius, doesn't get upset and instead shows how pointless the question itself is, by elegantly expressing the fundamental truth of the matter
www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO0r930Sn_8
.
( , Fri 9 Dec 2016, 9:59, Share, Reply)
beautiful
the first time i watched this i thought he was prevaricating to avoid having to answer the question but his answer was so much richer than that
( , Fri 9 Dec 2016, 10:25, Share, Reply)
the first time i watched this i thought he was prevaricating to avoid having to answer the question but his answer was so much richer than that
( , Fri 9 Dec 2016, 10:25, Share, Reply)
Comparing the two videos, Feynman makes the D-Ream keyboard player look like an intellectual minnow
I've got a lot of respect for Brian Cox, but I'm going to force my kids to watch Feynman once they're old enough.
( , Fri 9 Dec 2016, 10:44, Share, Reply)
I've got a lot of respect for Brian Cox, but I'm going to force my kids to watch Feynman once they're old enough.
( , Fri 9 Dec 2016, 10:44, Share, Reply)
my opinion is similar:
Comparing the two videos, Feynman makes the D-Ream keyboard player look like a cunt
( , Fri 9 Dec 2016, 12:10, Share, Reply)
Comparing the two videos, Feynman makes the D-Ream keyboard player look like a cunt
( , Fri 9 Dec 2016, 12:10, Share, Reply)
Cox can do a amazing job of explaining things, too.
The first half of 'Why does e equal mc squared?' is easily the best popular science I have ever read. Cox breaks down relativity to it's basics in an amazingly concise way over just a hundred or so pages. I think he has an amazing skill for explaining things.
( , Fri 9 Dec 2016, 12:22, Share, Reply)
The first half of 'Why does e equal mc squared?' is easily the best popular science I have ever read. Cox breaks down relativity to it's basics in an amazingly concise way over just a hundred or so pages. I think he has an amazing skill for explaining things.
( , Fri 9 Dec 2016, 12:22, Share, Reply)
Odd to get someone so technically brilliant with those communication skills
Pisses all over Dawkins who I suppose fills this 'public scientist' role these days.
( , Fri 9 Dec 2016, 10:33, Share, Reply)
Pisses all over Dawkins who I suppose fills this 'public scientist' role these days.
( , Fri 9 Dec 2016, 10:33, Share, Reply)
Watch the whole of that series (if you haven't already)
And anything else you can find too.
If anyone ever brings out the art vs science debate, just show them this: www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbFM3rn4ldo
( , Fri 9 Dec 2016, 10:49, Share, Reply)
And anything else you can find too.
If anyone ever brings out the art vs science debate, just show them this: www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbFM3rn4ldo
( , Fri 9 Dec 2016, 10:49, Share, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=nyDndEzmAZE
response from the artist friend that he mentions
( , Sat 10 Dec 2016, 9:16, Share, Reply)
yeah i agree, he's very watchable and has a hint of jazz to his voice :)
( , Fri 9 Dec 2016, 10:54, Share, Reply)
( , Fri 9 Dec 2016, 10:54, Share, Reply)