So holding a view which isn't supported by the 100% of facts,
is a crime against humanity? Careful.
You're essentially talking about criminalising independent thought, and classifying it more dangerous than all other crime.
Also specifically in this case, by banning Irving's work you'd lend credence to the notion that there is some kind of left wing conspiracy to prevent "the truth" of the Holocaust being widely known.
(, Sat 29 Apr 2017, 10:54, Share, Reply)