Eeeep.
I got worryingly close to agreeing with you there, but your use of the reductio ad absurdum doesn't quite work, so that saved me.
You were right up to that point, though.
( , Fri 18 Aug 2017, 21:09, Share, Reply)
I got worryingly close to agreeing with you there, but your use of the reductio ad absurdum doesn't quite work, so that saved me.
You were right up to that point, though.
( , Fri 18 Aug 2017, 21:09, Share, Reply)
It is entirely correct
Did I really need to say something like 'all humans are equal so no one should have to pay parking fines'.
Next!
edit: It is wrong to deny the moral force of an argument because you dispute the use of rhetorical description. Socrates would fucking eat you.
( , Fri 18 Aug 2017, 21:15, Share, Reply)
Did I really need to say something like 'all humans are equal so no one should have to pay parking fines'.
Next!
edit: It is wrong to deny the moral force of an argument because you dispute the use of rhetorical description. Socrates would fucking eat you.
( , Fri 18 Aug 2017, 21:15, Share, Reply)