He pulls up alongside 'em (why?), argues & then shoots "eight or nine times" =/= "giving him 'attitude'"
...unless you were trolling, in which case well done: I did genuinely say "WHAT!?" at the monitor when I read your comment.
(, Thu 29 Nov 2012, 11:26, Reply)
Well, I guess 'ole shooty' will get me through public speaking
(, Thu 29 Nov 2012, 11:40, Reply)
it's not entirely unreasonable
(, Thu 29 Nov 2012, 12:05, Reply)
That's not really the problem here though, is it?
(, Thu 29 Nov 2012, 12:43, Reply)
Perhaps they were stationary listening to loud music causing disruption to everyone around them, so he pulled up next to them and asked them to turn it down. Perhaps they gave him a load of aggressive, unreasonable bollocks back to him, so he wasted the guy. Just speculation, I wasn't there.
(, Thu 29 Nov 2012, 13:01, Reply)
I'm in fear of my life. I'll stand my ground and kill you.
It's a crazy law. It gives people who carry guns the right to inflame a situation and then, when things get heated, pull a gun and execute someone.
What's next? A mentally-ill homeless dude spits on the pavement and someone calls him on it. Homeless guy get's defensive, angry, and the you pull a gun and kill him? Is that what you want - 'cos that's what'll happen...
Oh dear. Came all over Enfield again...
Cheers
(, Thu 29 Nov 2012, 13:11, Reply)
there's a helluva lot of speculation, & not much evidence of what actually occurred.
(, Thu 29 Nov 2012, 13:25, Reply)
...might want to re-phrase that last sentence.
Unless you enjoy engaging in bukkake with aging comedians...
(, Thu 29 Nov 2012, 15:33, Reply)
Looks to me like he was trying to play the big man but quickly escalated the situation to something he couldn't handle.
Without the gun on him and a law that basically says "He was coming right for me", would this situation even have occurred?
(, Thu 29 Nov 2012, 13:50, Reply)