Usually this is
presented more in a line of "there is no such thing as society, because there are individual persons, families, all with different needs and problems, and as they are not hypothetical uniform entity, government can not nor should try to cater to all of their needs (as it will indirectly hurt some of them, yes taking money in form of taxes from their house budget and totally blowing it hurts, it's not rocket science)."
But it could be all in my head.
(
omnitruncatedkraken from Empire Algol, Wed 9 Jan 2013, 15:26,
Share,
Reply)
well, yes. Does that not fit my point? The individual at the expense of the collective.
(
feckler https://twitter.com/LeonardEctric1, Wed 9 Jan 2013, 15:44,
Share,
Reply)
The nonexistant collective, at expense of real individual more like.
You are taking money from very real individuals to sacrifice on the altar of some artificial social construct ;)
Taking aside our different views, we can go back on agreeing how original video is clearly deluded :)
(
omnitruncatedkraken from Empire Algol, Wed 9 Jan 2013, 16:00,
Share,
Reply)
"People have got the entitlements too much in mind, without the obligations. There's no such thing as entitlement, unless someone has first met an obligation."
(
JamTallons, Wed 9 Jan 2013, 16:18,
Share,
Reply)