Perhaps I'm showing a little ignorance here
but aren't referendums a good thing? If they just went ahead and pulled out (or indeed, stayed in) the EU regardless of the public opinion, wouldn't that cause massive uproar?
I hate Cameron, and I'm definitely not a Tory, but I can't quite grasp why asking the public what they want in this matter is a bad thing.
( , Wed 23 Jan 2013, 10:11, Share, Reply)
but aren't referendums a good thing? If they just went ahead and pulled out (or indeed, stayed in) the EU regardless of the public opinion, wouldn't that cause massive uproar?
I hate Cameron, and I'm definitely not a Tory, but I can't quite grasp why asking the public what they want in this matter is a bad thing.
( , Wed 23 Jan 2013, 10:11, Share, Reply)
Because democracy is only wanted when people vote the right way.
And can't be trusted with the important matters.
( , Wed 23 Jan 2013, 10:23, Share, Reply)
And can't be trusted with the important matters.
( , Wed 23 Jan 2013, 10:23, Share, Reply)
^ Exactly this
The biggest issue with democracy is that there are far more idiots in the world than geniuses.
Genghis Khan had the right idea.
( , Wed 23 Jan 2013, 10:46, Share, Reply)
The biggest issue with democracy is that there are far more idiots in the world than geniuses.
Genghis Khan had the right idea.
( , Wed 23 Jan 2013, 10:46, Share, Reply)
No, for a couple of reasons.
First, they're unnecessary: the constitution of the UK has it that it's the job of Parliament to represent the people. A referendum undermines that. (As several people on Twitter have said, it's odd that the very people who bang on about the EU's threat to Parliamentary sovereignty are those who're proposing a referendum that amounts to the same.)
Second, how often should there be a referendum, if you think that one is a good idea? If it's a good idea today, then why not next week as well? Every day, maybe, because people's minds may have changed.
Third - and similarly - why not on every subject? If it's a good idea in relation to x, why not y?
Fourth - and this relates back to the first - is it really certain that an appeal to the bare majority of the electorate is the best way to decide things? It's not at all a given that most people have the expertese to make a wise decision - something like an EU treaty is enormously complicated, and is well beyond just about everyone as an individual, so it's not clear that we'd get a particularly good result. Again, that's why there're armies of civil servants paid to write treaties and implement them, and to inform policy. It's massively complicated.
Oh, one last thing: pulling out of the EU would make things more difficult for UK businesses, simply because they'd still be bound by EU law if they wanted to sell in the Union - it's just that they'd not get a seat at the table.
( , Wed 23 Jan 2013, 10:26, Share, Reply)
First, they're unnecessary: the constitution of the UK has it that it's the job of Parliament to represent the people. A referendum undermines that. (As several people on Twitter have said, it's odd that the very people who bang on about the EU's threat to Parliamentary sovereignty are those who're proposing a referendum that amounts to the same.)
Second, how often should there be a referendum, if you think that one is a good idea? If it's a good idea today, then why not next week as well? Every day, maybe, because people's minds may have changed.
Third - and similarly - why not on every subject? If it's a good idea in relation to x, why not y?
Fourth - and this relates back to the first - is it really certain that an appeal to the bare majority of the electorate is the best way to decide things? It's not at all a given that most people have the expertese to make a wise decision - something like an EU treaty is enormously complicated, and is well beyond just about everyone as an individual, so it's not clear that we'd get a particularly good result. Again, that's why there're armies of civil servants paid to write treaties and implement them, and to inform policy. It's massively complicated.
Oh, one last thing: pulling out of the EU would make things more difficult for UK businesses, simply because they'd still be bound by EU law if they wanted to sell in the Union - it's just that they'd not get a seat at the table.
( , Wed 23 Jan 2013, 10:26, Share, Reply)
We would have to renegotiate a shit load of trade agreements too, which will cost money
And thats going to be some interesting negotiations. It would be like some one unilaterally pulling their investment out of a business, butting it at risk, then expecting to still be able to use the office space and the company perks...
( , Wed 23 Jan 2013, 10:33, Share, Reply)
And thats going to be some interesting negotiations. It would be like some one unilaterally pulling their investment out of a business, butting it at risk, then expecting to still be able to use the office space and the company perks...
( , Wed 23 Jan 2013, 10:33, Share, Reply)
And here I was expected a "wanker" or "prick" response.
That was well written and clearly explained what I didn't understand about it.
Thanks for that.
Can we be friends?
( , Wed 23 Jan 2013, 10:40, Share, Reply)
That was well written and clearly explained what I didn't understand about it.
Thanks for that.
Can we be friends?
( , Wed 23 Jan 2013, 10:40, Share, Reply)
Completely logical and pragmatic points made there.
This referendum issue is so complicated and as are the implications of an 'out' vote that I'm not confident that all of us who haven't read and understood all of these EU treaties, and those of us who are not knowledgeable in economics, should really vote in matters of such far reaching importance.
I just don't trust the sweet words of Bill Cash or or the simplistic answers that Nigel Farange offers.
( , Wed 23 Jan 2013, 10:43, Share, Reply)
This referendum issue is so complicated and as are the implications of an 'out' vote that I'm not confident that all of us who haven't read and understood all of these EU treaties, and those of us who are not knowledgeable in economics, should really vote in matters of such far reaching importance.
I just don't trust the sweet words of Bill Cash or or the simplistic answers that Nigel Farange offers.
( , Wed 23 Jan 2013, 10:43, Share, Reply)
So what rights should a citizen have towards self determination?
( , Wed 23 Jan 2013, 10:55, Share, Reply)
( , Wed 23 Jan 2013, 10:55, Share, Reply)
The rights we have at the moment seem to have worked well for a long time.
( , Wed 23 Jan 2013, 11:15, Share, Reply)
( , Wed 23 Jan 2013, 11:15, Share, Reply)
I read most of the Lisbon Treaty
I'm guessing they left the interesting, controversial stuff to the end. I couldn't see anything in it that fundamentally changed our Sovereignty... You'll be happy to hear I've got a bit of a life since then.. ;)
( , Wed 23 Jan 2013, 10:57, Share, Reply)
I'm guessing they left the interesting, controversial stuff to the end. I couldn't see anything in it that fundamentally changed our Sovereignty... You'll be happy to hear I've got a bit of a life since then.. ;)
( , Wed 23 Jan 2013, 10:57, Share, Reply)