The Russian government have banned lingerie
“This gives the impression that we have no other problems right now,” she explained. “I mean, if they’re discussing underwear problems at the legislative level.”
( , Tue 29 Jul 2014, 20:18, Share, Reply)
“This gives the impression that we have no other problems right now,” she explained. “I mean, if they’re discussing underwear problems at the legislative level.”
( , Tue 29 Jul 2014, 20:18, Share, Reply)
I've read about this
Lots of women protested by wearing lingerie as hats, apparently.
Of all the things to ban, seriously!?
( , Tue 29 Jul 2014, 20:21, Share, Reply)
Lots of women protested by wearing lingerie as hats, apparently.
Of all the things to ban, seriously!?
( , Tue 29 Jul 2014, 20:21, Share, Reply)
So this means there will be loads of women walking around with no underwear on.
Cool.
( , Tue 29 Jul 2014, 20:42, Share, Reply)
Cool.
( , Tue 29 Jul 2014, 20:42, Share, Reply)
They haven't banned underwear
they've just banned underwear made from synthetic materials. So the ladies don't get all sweaty around their 'down-belows'.
Public health, innit?
( , Tue 29 Jul 2014, 20:56, Share, Reply)
they've just banned underwear made from synthetic materials. So the ladies don't get all sweaty around their 'down-belows'.
Public health, innit?
( , Tue 29 Jul 2014, 20:56, Share, Reply)
I understood it was lacey (provocative) underwear
But I'm willing to stand corrected. Still stupid though. If that's the case, why just underwear?
( , Tue 29 Jul 2014, 21:36, Share, Reply)
But I'm willing to stand corrected. Still stupid though. If that's the case, why just underwear?
( , Tue 29 Jul 2014, 21:36, Share, Reply)
It isn't just 'underwear' as in 'panties'
It's 'clothing worn next to the body'.
( , Wed 30 Jul 2014, 6:43, Share, Reply)
It's 'clothing worn next to the body'.
( , Wed 30 Jul 2014, 6:43, Share, Reply)