b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1599383 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

I try to take a socially responsible approach in everything I do
I have spent all morning tidying my desk and clearing out all the drawers in a socially responsible manner.
It turns out that my desk was almost entirely full of useless shite.

Alt: I have no interest in London mayoral elections. I shall probably vote against having an elected mayor in my city when the polls open in May.
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:44, 1 reply, 12 years ago)
Well done Hippy, good answer.
I have decided to be nice to you as use wishy washy liberal types need to stick together against the Nazi Coalition headed by Fuhrer Boyce.
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:47, Reply)
Tangled is hardly the Rev Al Sharpton.

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:48, Reply)
No, I'm better than him

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:50, Reply)
I've just had a quick scan through that previous thread.
What a bunch of nasty little right-wingers we have round here.
Come the revolution, Comrade...
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:49, Reply)
Indeed.
At least it seems we can rely on the support of Quinten, and maybe Gonz. The makes us more awesome, if not more literate.
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:52, Reply)
Your boy Quentin is really growing into a fine young man.
He'll make you proud one day.
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:57, Reply)
He already does, he already does.
*wipes away a tear*
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:06, Reply)
They're generally angry bitter people who don't believe that a country has to protect it's citizens.

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:53, Reply)
Nothing wrong with protecting the weak and vulnerable.
Dole scum job-avoiding workshy cunts who are perfectly able to get and keep a job are not weak and or vulnerable. They are lazy and should not be supported by the state.
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:57, Reply)
What about their children?

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:58, Reply)
Feckless.

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:59, Reply)
So are they born lazy? Or are they taught to be lazy?

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:59, Reply)
Both.
With those parents as role models.
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:59, Reply)
The whole 'nature versus nuture' debate is much broader than this.
TBH, I can't be arsed to begin discussing that.
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:03, Reply)
Or do they have laziness thrust upon them?

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:06, Reply)
Or shot
I'm voting option B
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:59, Reply)
Not so
they/we just think that if you are getting something for free that you don't have the right to bitch about where you get it.
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 11:58, Reply)
^ This ^

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:02, Reply)
I don't want them living near me. They make the place look untidy.
Send them Up North where they can spruce the place up and teach the denizens how to use a knife and fork. An shit indoors.
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:05, Reply)
I wouldn't protect any fucker that doesn't know where apostrophes go.

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:04, Reply)
THATS THE JOKE

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:07, Reply)
Nice to see you have finally adopted this's spelling.

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:14, Reply)
urrrrgh
people who don't get apostrophes really annoy me. it's soooooo simple.

abbreviation or possessive? it gets an apostrophe. plural? it doesn't. the only two exceptions you need in every day life are "its" and "it's" and "who's" and "whose". THAT'S IT! THAT REALLY IS IT! THAT'S THE GOLDEN RULE YOU MORON.

when i am queen, i will burn every shop selling "fish and chip's".
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:22, Reply)
Chip's what?

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:24, Reply)
Can you also destroy all people who mix up "was" and "were" in speech?

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:25, Reply)
First up against the wall
"were not were"
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:26, Reply)
don't "shake your head" at that

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:32, Reply)
As well as "have" and "of".

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:28, Reply)
oh god
"well, i was sat over there"...

shudder.
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:30, Reply)
isn't the fundamental problem there "sat" not "sitting" ?

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:32, Reply)
either "i sat" or "i was sitting" would be fine
"i was sat" implies someone picked you up and forcibly parked your arse.
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:43, Reply)
and no
the fundamental problem is, if you say that, you are a colossal fuckwit
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:43, Reply)
I was not disputing that for a second, my dear.

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:47, Reply)
Can we welcome you to The Cause Mr. Chomp?

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:06, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1