b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1634692 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | Popular

This news story is a bit interesting.
www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/jun/06/unpaid-jubilee-jobseekers-downing-street

What are your opinions? Do you think that people should have access to toilets and somewhere to change or ARE THEY ALL SCROUNGING LAZY MOANY CUNTS??!?!?!?!

I also like how the government doesn't give a toss that as a direct result of their policy people are being treated badly.

Alt: fuck you
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:19, 132 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
Molly Prince was on the radio this morning saying "It was just a logistics error"

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:23, Reply)
Them arriving at the place two hours early could be a error.
That's explainable but shoddy. Them not having changing rooms and being expected to change on a coach parked on the street isn't a logistics error. Them not having access to toilets isn't a logistics error. Them being expected to work very long shifts unpaid wasn't anything to do with logistics. They were doing security for a big event on the cheap, which to be honest is terrifying.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:28, Reply)
No, no, no, no.
The company was paying for their very expensive license and giving them VALUABLE WORK EXPERIENCE. Not to mention combat trousers and boots worth £100.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:29, Reply)
Oh that's ok then, I think we should all be paid in clothes...

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:30, Reply)

+ pegs
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:30, Reply)
You want to be pegged?

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:31, Reply)
Good
God, no.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:32, Reply)
Sounds like you're wavering.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:34, Reply)
I
never had any doubts, thank you.

My piles would bleed.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:35, Reply)
yes
this.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:29, Reply)
Your mum is a logistics error.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:32, Reply)
Your logistics error cost you your daughter.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:34, Reply)
My logistics error caused her to exist in the first place.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:39, Reply)
I am pleased to advise that Ray 'shit' Bradbury has finally had the good manners to die.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:24, Reply)
:(

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:26, Reply)
I liked some of his short storys, not many though.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:28, Reply)
Why do you think he is shit?

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:28, Reply)
because he is a contrary bugger

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:28, Reply)
Because of the shitness of his books.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:32, Reply)
fiver says duke of edinburgh kicks his bucket before dec 31st

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:29, Reply)
my mate reckons he's already dead
but they won't announce it while people are jubileeing it up
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:30, Reply)
machines will be keeping him going until betty says he can bog off

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:32, Reply)
Your mate is an idiot.
What would happen if they did release it? Riots in the streets? Suicide doubling? or... fuck all except some news coverage and a hastily put together 100 best gaffs clip show.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:32, Reply)
There might be a MONTAGE OF CLIPS, Chompy, A MONTAGE.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:33, Reply)
I can imagine the FTSE plummeting on that news.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:34, Reply)
With "hilarious" commentry from "comedians" such as Lee Mack, Miranda Hart and that irritating northern cunt Stuart Maconie (or however you spell his shit northern monkey name)

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:35, Reply)
He really is a spactic, that one.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:36, Reply)
A bent spactic at that.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:39, Reply)
Lee Mack is alright.
Not great, but alright.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:40, Reply)
I dislike him after his attempt at being funny alongside Miranda Hart.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:45, Reply)
Alongside her he probably was.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:50, Reply)
Is your mate a twat?
What fucking nonsense.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:33, Reply)
DUKE OV MY HART
WIV DA ANGLES
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:39, Reply)
The main reason I'd heard of him was due to a 'comedy' song written about him
I'd heard of his books, just didn't know it was him that had written them.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:33, Reply)
sorry but i don't know why you're posting this
they've completely explained why they exploited these people, 'because it was a one-off' so that makes it ok
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:29, Reply)
were you one of them Quint?
did you have to sleep under a bridge?
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:36, Reply)
he already lives under a bridge

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:37, Reply)
That's the..... of FFS.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:38, Reply)
i'm not a troll :(

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:39, Reply)
it was a joke.
grow a spine boy.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:43, Reply)
oh
sorry
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:43, Reply)
my fireball does 50+ damage to your groin

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:40, Reply)
ah sir gimpsalot and his fiery lance of nerd

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:42, Reply)
my shart of justice penetrates your ice cold vaginatron

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:58, Reply)
Of course they had access to toilets, they weren't expected to stand around in incontinence pants whilst staring into the distance during their FOURTEEN HOUR (with breaks) shift of being stood round doing not alot

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:36, Reply)
It does sound a bit hyped up, doesn't it?
Interesting how how having to change IN PUBLIC is now on a coach, in public, which might, or might not, be perfectly reasonable.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:38, Reply)
They weren't allowed to change on the coach though, it fucked off as soon as they were dropped off.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:40, Reply)
Why couldn't they have changed on the coach
during the four-hour drive to London?
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:41, Reply)
do you enjoy changing for work on the tube?

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:42, Reply)
Frankly yes. A great deal.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:43, Reply)
OK then.
I was basing it on this post:http://www.b3ta.com/questions/offtopic/post1634700

as I assumed CHompy knew what he was taking about.

what was the under the bridge thing, did they have a tent?
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:45, Reply)
Nope. they were meant to be dropped off at 5am, change on the coach then get to work soon after
they got dropped off around 3am, the coach fucked off, they had to wait there until 5 or 6am and then they were told to get changed on the street and get to work.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:48, Reply)
OK, so not actually spending the night under a bridge then?
I do agree it's wrong and bad and shit, but presenting the bare facts would have been better.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:50, Reply)
Ah but there's no rabid story, then, is there?

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:52, Reply)
it's still a pretty shitty way to treat people and something I'd be angry about
there's no need to try and make it sound worse by lying. it's not even The Mail here, it's actually a grown up newspaper.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:54, Reply)
No question it's really shit
but no shitter than many other things. Serious 'slow news day' stuff.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:56, Reply)
Have you read both articles?

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:58, Reply)
I've not read either of them. I'm just trying to start an argument on here out of boredom.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:00, Reply)
Honesty online,
it's refreshing.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:01, Reply)
Read both articles, their not rabid at all, they just list the claims and counter claims.
www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jun/04/jubilee-pageant-unemployed
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:57, Reply)
read my posts and don't attribute monty's words to me
then sod off.

laters.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:01, Reply)
That was a reply to both of you.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:02, Reply)
Are you saying there's something wrong with my words?
WELL ARE YOU?
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:06, Reply)
there's something wrong with anyone's words
if they can't distinguish between "there" and "their" and "they're".
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:27, Reply)
They were told to bed down and sleep under the bridge while they waited for their shift to start.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:52, Reply)
I heard they were told to clean chimneys until daylight
and were then flogged if they asked for more gruel. That's what I heard.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:54, Reply)
Meh.
lying story has made me loose interest. this is why I don't read newspapers.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:55, Reply)
You don't read newspapers, you read what's said on here without checking the original article
then blame the newspapers.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:57, Reply)
I blame the newspapers for CQ not having read them.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:00, Reply)
I read the article
and what was on here. neither gave all the details that Al and you appear to have. none of this changes the fact that newspapers spout biased bollocks, even the ones I agree with. I'll stick to the radio or tv or other sources.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:00, Reply)
We listen to Today, because we're fucking cool.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:01, Reply)
Good job the radio and TV are unbiased, then.
It's a weight off my mind and no mistake.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:34, Reply)
No they were meant to change on the coach but the coach drove off.
So they had to change on the street.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:42, Reply)

www.b3ta.com/questions/offtopic/post1634755
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:45, Reply)
OH MY GOD THE GUBBERMINT WILL BE DOIN THE SAME FING DOORIN DE OLYMPIKS
expecting minimally trained dolers to be stood round doin not alot instead of paying for minimally trained agency to be stood round doin not alot
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:42, Reply)
From a purely economic and right wing standpoint.
We shouldn't be paying job seekers allowance for people who are doing work for someone.
They should be getting at least minimum wage and paying tax on it, then they can go and spend that wage on whatever they want making the economy that little bit better.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:45, Reply)
I believe the jubilee was a dry run, if they turned up for that they'll get to do the Olympics on minimum wage

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:47, Reply)
It's amazing how many people have trial shifts at my local pub, at least one every friday and saturday
but I never see them afterwards, they must not be good enough.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:49, Reply)
It's the company that loses out having some prick with one arm longer than the other 'shadow' an existing member of staff for a shift
and then decide afterwards that it's 'not really their thing'. Not that they'll ever tell you mind, they just won't turn up ever again.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:59, Reply)
It doesn't matter if it was a "dry run" or not

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:51, Reply)
That's not what your mum said.
she was fucken livid.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:52, Reply)
Alot of these unemployed types struggle to get out of bed, this was their big chance to prove themselves
not be little sissys goin cryin about the indignity of waiting around and having to change 'a bit rough and ready' before a day of doin essentially fuck all
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:56, Reply)
They're all on drugs. That's what I heard.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:58, Reply)
freebasing serious meow meow and bath salts

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:00, Reply)
Surfing the Ivory Wave.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:11, Reply)
I expect you'd be happy and chipper in their situation, keeping your eyes to the ground and wringing your cap.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:00, Reply)
yesh thurr

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:01, Reply)
Surely they'd be below the tax threshold?

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:49, Reply)
I expect so, still they wouldn't get the £60 ish a week JSA

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:52, Reply)
And they would be generating national insurance payments from the company they work for.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:56, Reply)
It's all part of the Big Society.
Which is expecting people to work for nothing. So cunts like Cameron can roll around on their carpets of £50 note bundles. Seems fair to me.
Edit. Encourage people to take an active role in their communities (volunteerism).
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:00, Reply)
THAT'S RUBBISH!
They were in central London. Everyone knows there aren't any lavatories there.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:40, Reply)
they were forbidden from using the thousands of portaloos positioned everywhere
that hasn't been written anywhere yet but it's the only explanation
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:43, Reply)
That'll definitely be the case
and I for one DEMAND THE RESIGNATION OF 'DAV-CAM'.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:45, Reply)
down with work experience

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:46, Reply)
SMASH VER CISTERN*
*not that there are any to smash, as we have seen above.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 16:48, Reply)
OK now.
'they had to change into their clothing - which included a plastic poncho for protection against the rain and high-visibility jacket' - so they weren't provided with changing rooms to put a fucking coat on?

Hardly 'PE in your vest and pants' is it?
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:17, Reply)
it's so shit, why is it a story at all

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:21, Reply)
they'll all be back to smoking reefers and playing mario cart today anyway
fear not the guardian the liberalism of the rights of the unemployed to do nothing have not been imperiled, and we can still increase the national deficit by purchasing everything from the far east
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:23, Reply)
woolly liberals, rory

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:26, Reply)
So the usual storm in a teacup bollocks.
Quelle surprise.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:21, Reply)
thats exactly how i got my first Paedo Education

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:22, Reply)
You usually get changing rooms for PE.
Plus there was talk that they provided security uniforms including trousers earlier on.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:22, Reply)
im not gonna read it so
Fuck you
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:21, Reply)
i'm glad someones making a stand
this place has been shit lately, i might leave
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:22, Reply)
Can I have a lift?

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:24, Reply)
only if things escalate

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:25, Reply)
I've already left, Q
I'm another one of those social vampires that only turn up for the bashes.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:30, Reply)
did you hear about tehm bulgarian vampires?
who'd have thought wombles could get infected too
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:31, Reply)
Hahaha
(5am rape Barry lol)
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:34, Reply)
liar

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:24, Reply)
i'm not standing for these sort of accusations

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:25, Reply)
we all know you'll never leave

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:26, Reply)
i've got a bottle of rosé, i don't need you guys

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:26, Reply)
i haven't really got a bottle of rosé
sorry everyone, i did see a bottle of it the other day but i didn't get it, i was just trying to seem ilke a big man
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:29, Reply)
then try not drinking a pink drink?

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:30, Reply)
but you must drink rose, and you seem like a big man

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:30, Reply)
re-read your comments about boning me up above
then remind yourself of this
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:32, Reply)
eurgh! what have i bloody said now?
i swear i'm gonna throw an eppy at joe if he's been using this account again
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:32, Reply)
you silly cow
shart is fart particles, i was saying i'd fart up your cunt
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:33, Reply)
i don't know waht's with me today, i just called malc fat
must be my time of the month
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:32, Reply)
i think it takes guts to admit to it
Men around here that drink jim and jack act like fools
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:32, Reply)
What you're trying to say is that you think he's a woofter.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:40, Reply)
I'd quite like to see that 'Ill Manors'.
True story.

EDIT I listened to 'Plan B's' TED talk and he seems like a bright enough kid, but he's an apologist for the urban peasantry and I didn't agree with some of what he was saying at all. He is at least articulate.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:36, Reply)
I was a big fan of that Downton Abbey.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:37, Reply)
I thought you'd left?
FFS typical lying Frog.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:39, Reply)
There are some excellent talks on TED.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:57, Reply)
Fuck 'em.
Create labour camps and send them all there. Moaning lazy shitcunts.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:43, Reply)
Mein Gott!
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-18343183

That's a 'woman' apparently.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:48, Reply)

Looks a bit like Ian Brown.
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:51, Reply)
The victim looks like a bloke (in a wig) as well.

(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 17:52, Reply)
I
Can't tell them Londoners apart. All look the fuckin' same, innit?
(, Wed 6 Jun 2012, 18:09, Reply)

« Go Back | Reply To This »

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1