You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic | Search

This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 0:00)
Pages: Latest, 289, 288, 287, 286, 285, ... 4, 3, 2, 1

« Back

This is a QotW answer This makes me angry
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7983993.stm

And here's why: www.antipolygraph.org/
(, Mon 6 Apr 2009, 12:38, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Awesome,
Now I can be lie-detector-proof :D
Thanks!
(, Mon 6 Apr 2009, 12:47, Reply)
This is a QotW comment But we should get them banned!
It's almost incomprehensibly stupid for the Government to be doing this but we're talking about sex offenders (oh noes the kiddy fiddlers) it'd be political suicide for them to go back on this.
(, Mon 6 Apr 2009, 12:52, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Yeah...
We shouldn't rely on them.
A test that relies on control-question to establish base-line values is one of the easiest to skew.

I blame Jeremy Kyle. They use it on his show all the time.

And the peasant masses take things on that show as gospel.
Stupid Jeremy Kyle.
(, Mon 6 Apr 2009, 12:55, Reply)
This is a QotW comment stupid peasants too
I couldn't believe it when I heard about this.

this country is run by fucking idiots
(, Mon 6 Apr 2009, 13:01, Reply)
This is a QotW comment This is why
I should be in charge.

Or at least The Minister For Truth And Justice.
(, Mon 6 Apr 2009, 13:03, Reply)
This is a QotW comment I'm all for that
I'm not stupid and annoying (I think) so I should be safe.

and I only commit victimless crimes.
(, Mon 6 Apr 2009, 13:04, Reply)
This is a QotW comment From what I've been reading Kaol
It's not even as scientific as that...

Apparently it *only* works it the person taking the test believes it will and the tester has tried to increase their fear of being detected. It's completely absurd and has no merit whatsoever.

Even thinking of it as useful but not conclusive is giving it far more than it deserves. I'd love one of the UK terrestrial channels to put together an robust documentary discrediting them but I get the impression it'd fall on deaf ears unless it was done *very* well and even then it'd struggle to influence many people =[
(, Mon 6 Apr 2009, 13:06, Reply)
This is a QotW comment V
they'd probably say it was funded by the oil companies and therefore can't possibly be true.
(, Mon 6 Apr 2009, 13:14, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Are you angry...

because you are a sex offender?
(, Mon 6 Apr 2009, 13:16, Reply)
This is a QotW comment No
I'm angry because they'll end up giving the results far more weight than they deserve (that'd be any weight at all) and we risk something like this happening. I'm just glad that (at the moment) they're not using them to try and prove guilt, at least this way nobody innocent should be getting accused of being a sex offender based on pseudo-science.
(, Mon 6 Apr 2009, 13:23, Reply)
This is a QotW comment
And because you fuck kids...
(, Mon 6 Apr 2009, 13:48, Reply)
This is a QotW comment
='[
(, Mon 6 Apr 2009, 13:55, Reply)
This is a QotW comment That's exactly the face
The kids pull, after :(
(, Mon 6 Apr 2009, 13:56, Reply)
This is a QotW comment V is only 12
so it's OK
(, Mon 6 Apr 2009, 15:01, Reply)

Reply »

Pages: Latest, 289, 288, 287, 286, 285, ... 4, 3, 2, 1