You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic | Search

This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 0:00)
Pages: Latest, 283, 282, 281, 280, 279, ... 4, 3, 2, 1

« Back

This is a QotW answer What the
Why are there no reply buttons to replies in QOTW threads

I've re-added them to Off Topic.
This could be unpopular, but there's so many replies which are "@username I agree!" then a 500 word post as per usual.
This makes life a lot more readable.
To make your lives easier, the "replies" count now counts subreplies.
For any complaints, gaz me and I'll do my best to help.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 16:57, Reply)
This is a QotW comment This should have a reply button

(, Thu 7 May 2009, 16:58, Reply)
This is a QotW comment INTERNET CR3!
A JMG favourite!

I take it you're here for the takeover?
I must dash, myself. O****** *irl and all that.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 16:59, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Right, now there are reply buttons
Strange logic in the code. Have I done something I shouldn't have?
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:02, Reply)
This is a QotW comment YES!!!
I think you're smashing, internet cr3.
Thank you for this step forward towards the joining of Off Topic and /Talk.


*JMG Anthem*
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:03, Reply)
This is a QotW comment this was added a while ago
and general consensus was that most people preferred it the old way, on OT at least, so it got changed back.

I find it highly amusing that you've changed it again though, even though I prefer the old way.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:10, Reply)
This is a QotW comment So people specifically wanted no nesting because it makes conversations too easy to follow or something?
Christ
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:11, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Yeah...
Some of the mongos couldn't follow nested conversations.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:13, Reply)
This is a QotW comment I believe the mongos you're referring to
were you, TGB and Herr Doktor Lemminge etc
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:15, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Nope...
You, by the look of it:
b3ta.com/questions/bugs_and_feature_requests/post243924
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:21, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Wrong again, Kaol
I was explaining the way that other people wanted the replies to be, I wasn't particularly fussed.

Are you ever right about anything?
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:25, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Oh right.
Well, thanks for clearing that up.
EDIT: Yeah, sometimes. You'd be surprised.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:27, Reply)
This is a QotW comment I doubt that
"To be honest, it took them months to do anything about our suggestions for off topic, so it'll be a while before they do anything again, I think. Not that I'm complaining, I appreciate that they're trying different things, all for our benefit." -See? You bloody invalid, when are you going to stop your ceaseless bullying of me and get a real girlfriend?
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:29, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Awh, no need to get upset.
Anyway, I'm going now.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:32, Reply)
This is a QotW comment GOOD
You awful, hideous little man
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:34, Reply)
This is a QotW comment each to their own
I don't find it easier either way tbh, but having them nested upsets my crippling un-diagnosed asbergers.


mostly though, people fear change.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:14, Reply)
This is a QotW comment They (perhaps me too, I don't remember...?)
preferred the linearity for the Home Sweet Home threads, so one, day-long conversation could be tracked from start to finish
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:14, Reply)
This is a QotW comment I suspect you are right
oh sexmonkey o' mine.

I can see this working better now.

as long as it doesn't get all /talk-like
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:15, Reply)
This is a QotW comment In what sense?

(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:18, Reply)
This is a QotW comment In a Y/m sense I presume

(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:20, Reply)
This is a QotW comment ym

(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:21, Reply)
This is a QotW comment I quite like the way people write things at length on here
not afraid to spend several paragraphs on something, rather than blurting out the first thing that comes to mind.

I'm not here to use it is an instant chatroom, I'm not hitting f5 all the time, so it's nice to not have to skim a million single line posts.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:22, Reply)
This is a QotW comment I'd agree with you there
it's a balance though, I want more humourous posts, not just people talking about themselves.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:27, Reply)
This is a QotW comment I agree
although I do like to talk about myself....
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:30, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Then make it a bit more wacky, V
Tell us all about that time you stepped on a rake, and badgers stole the lining from your shoes
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:32, Reply)
This is a QotW comment funny you should say that....
forget that actually, a bird just flew at insanely high speed into the window by my desk. It's still vibrating...
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:34, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Turn it into a bestselling hardback
You'll make millions, and might be able to get a bird of your own
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:35, Reply)
This is a QotW comment The dark secrets of individual replies...
...have been divulged. By JMG actually.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:02, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Now you're all free to be just like us /talk users.
Another step forward for you all.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:04, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Well, you have buttons anyway now.

(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:04, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Most OT'rs decided they didn't want to have nested responses
so they were removed. I don't really mind them.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:05, Reply)
This is a QotW comment I think that was before you killed HSH
Now I'm sure people won't mind
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:10, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Oh well. No great loss then.

(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:15, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Well done, that man!

(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:05, Reply)
This is a QotW comment See?

(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:05, Reply)
This is a QotW comment It all

(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:05, Reply)
This is a QotW comment makes sense, now!

(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:06, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Excellent
Hello DiT!
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:05, Reply)
This is a QotW comment And hello to you!
How's tricks?

EDIT: Psst! Look at my sig!
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:06, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Same old really...
I'm bored on a Thursday and have been ever so slightly amused by JMG, but he's not on form today which is a pity.

And yourself? Have you tarnished the pristine anodizing of your new Specialized with mud yet?
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:08, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Sounds groovy
I'll consult with my internet girlfriend and will see if we can make it!
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:09, Reply)
This is a QotW comment It hasn't been muddied yet, no...
But it has done a fair bit of road riding while I get used to it. However - tonight's the night! I'm gonna find me some puddles.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:15, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Good work!
We must meet for that ride we've been on about. Epping Forest is your local stamping grounds isn't it?
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:18, Reply)
This is a QotW comment For sure.
I do indeed stamp around Epping Forest. Generally, you can recognise me by my calls of "Oh Fuck!" and "I nearly came off then!" or sometimes even "WAAAAAUUUURRRGGHHHH!"

It's all good though.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:20, Reply)
This is a QotW comment JMG on form?
When? How? Why?
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:19, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Afternoon DG!
He has been quite funny, particularly with his linux analogies.

However today he's merely being obtuse for kicks, which leaves me feeling very short changed in the value department.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:21, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Can you do a popular page too?
Please thanks, I'd appreciate it an awful lot, and I'd even be nice to you and everything
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:13, Reply)
This is a QotW comment *cough*
That is /all
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:15, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Fuck me
You're right!

Why hasn't anybody clicked anything since July last year?
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:17, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Speaking for myself
I only click "I like this" on Offtopic very rarely. I didn't think the clicks counted.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:19, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Me either
but from now on, I'll be clicking my own posts vigorously
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:20, Reply)
This is a QotW comment fnar
As you or one of your alter-egos?

I've set up an alter-ego recently and intend on having some fun with it.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:24, Reply)
This is a QotW comment I'm sticking to this profile now
It was nice to start from scratch without all those horrible 'friends' expecting things of me and getting in a strop
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:31, Reply)
This is a QotW comment remarks like that make me stroppy Bert

(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:59, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Is there anything that doesn't make you stroppy?
It wasn't directed at you.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 18:03, Reply)
This is a QotW comment B3ta being fucking slow makes me stroppy
other than that, just you acting like a cunt...
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 18:12, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Exactly
acting like a cunt, not actually being a cunt, like some people...
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 18:15, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Your acting involves taking your shirt off so everyone can see you're incredibly hairy
and then oozing juice and occasionally blood everywhere.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 18:21, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Love juice?
Aye, it's fantastic.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 18:24, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Evening cunty pants
What's Bert done now?
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 18:20, Reply)
This is a QotW comment I'm offending everybody, al
it's terrible
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 18:21, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Terrible like YOUR FACE
you ugly dog wanker.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 18:23, Reply)
This is a QotW comment *clicks*
*goes to check the /all page*
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 18:25, Reply)
This is a QotW comment I prefer the old way
It shows when a post has new replies, and those new replies are at the bottom, easy to find.

With nesting neither is true, which makes browsing OT frustrating rather than fun.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 17:46, Reply)
This is a QotW comment I prefer your face
when it's got Berts cock in it.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 18:33, Reply)
This is a QotW comment I prefer cock
when it's got your face on it.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 18:34, Reply)
This is a QotW comment I prefer got
when it's cock your face on it.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 18:37, Reply)
This is a QotW comment This could totally be a song
I got cock when face your on it was
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 18:38, Reply)
This is a QotW comment My brain just won't cope
it worked before, noone complained. If we wanted it like talk, surely we'd be on there?

I'm a frickin simpleton and get confused easily. I hope that it makes sense the new way. I'll give it a go tho. Can't say more than that.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 18:47, Reply)
This is a QotW comment Well, I like it.
Thank you very much, cr3.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 19:12, Reply)
This is a QotW comment nicely done cr3!

(, Thu 7 May 2009, 20:28, Reply)
This is a QotW comment I prefer the old way
QOTWOT is not \talk. We're used to reading the end of threads rather than scrolling around looking for new replies.

We don't mean to sound ungrateful, and we appreciate the work you've put into this. I'm sure the new search-thingy will come in handy.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 20:37, Reply)
This is a QotW comment But it doesn't matter.
You don't have to use the nested replies. You don't have to use the nested replies.

It's a fucking miracle that OT is still going considering that every time someone (moddish) makes a change, a whole bunch of people start whining because it isn't like they feel it oughta be.

I don't particularly care either way, it just gets right on my tits that the people that run this site (for free, no less) appear to be damned if they do, and damned if they don't.

I'm not having a go by the way, Spakka, I'm just saying, is all.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 20:49, Reply)
This is a QotW comment .
"You don't have to use the nested replies."
True, but if both styles of replies get mixed up, things could be messy.

I too appreciate the work the mods put into this site - especially as they do it for free. It's just that I found I liked non-nested replies better.

Anyway, instead of complaining further, I've posted a suggestion in the link below that could make both the nested and non-nested people happier.
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 21:03, Reply)
This is a QotW comment I've thought of a compromise
www.b3ta.com/questions/bugs_and_feature_requests/post416998
(, Thu 7 May 2009, 20:58, Reply)

Reply »

Pages: Latest, 283, 282, 281, 280, 279, ... 4, 3, 2, 1