You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » The Victorian Internet » Message 2332249

[challenge entry] In other news...

From the The Victorian Internet challenge. See all 320 entries (closed)

(, Fri 14 Nov 2003, 16:07, archived)
# excellent
and in keeping with your prior work
(, Fri 14 Nov 2003, 16:09, archived)
# Ohh
nice woo yay :)
(, Fri 14 Nov 2003, 16:10, archived)
# Haha
American chappies "shooting indian chappies"

class.
(, Fri 14 Nov 2003, 16:09, archived)
# nice one
The Light Brigade bit is particularly good.
(, Fri 14 Nov 2003, 16:10, archived)
# pedant strikes again!
The charge of the light brigade was 6000 not 600 thus the poem by Tennison says
Excellent pic though, woo!
(, Fri 14 Nov 2003, 16:11, archived)
# Nah,
600.

Definitely 600.
(, Fri 14 Nov 2003, 16:12, archived)
# yeah
you are right, i have no idea where i got 6000 from. just sit me int eh corner and feed my skittles
(, Fri 14 Nov 2003, 16:14, archived)
# Do I win 10 pounds?
Can you see the other mistakes?
(, Fri 14 Nov 2003, 16:15, archived)
# ermm
man see ankle 'on' house of ill repute....
just ignore, me, forever.
it is a bloody good tattyshop though
(, Fri 14 Nov 2003, 16:17, archived)
# I was thinking of the hundreds of
temporal errors in the news
(, Fri 14 Nov 2003, 16:18, archived)
# isn't it..
the century rounded up edition?
(, Fri 14 Nov 2003, 16:20, archived)
# ......is the right answer
(, Fri 14 Nov 2003, 16:21, archived)
# Maybe only 10% were confident, though?
(, Fri 14 Nov 2003, 16:12, archived)
# /pedant
actual number at start of charge generally
accepted by military historians as 673.

/coat
(, Fri 14 Nov 2003, 16:19, archived)
# 600 light brigaders confident of win
hahhahahahahahahahaha

class!!!
(, Fri 14 Nov 2003, 16:11, archived)
# made me laugh
with 5 seperate headlines
(, Fri 14 Nov 2003, 16:12, archived)
# well, we have a winner
everyone else can go home now.
(, Fri 14 Nov 2003, 16:22, archived)
# Ooooh just seen this -hehehehhehhehhe
woman 'in love with another woman' mystery

hahahahahahahahahaha
(, Fri 14 Nov 2003, 16:39, archived)