..and it has been 'appropriated'..by the daily HateMail. As are most images from here.
(,
Thu 28 Jan 2010, 20:13,
archived)
yep - just came here to add that to this postwww.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1246801/Apple-iPad-met-derision-laughter-web-users.html
it's also had some attention on twitter:
twitter.com/#search?q=1264637379
(it's also had some attention on twitter:
twitter.com/#search?q=1264637379
rob,
Thu 28 Jan 2010, 20:53,
archived)
Goodness me.What's the protocol in these situations? Does one sue?
(
Bad Horsey Bring back Dr. Ubes Rub!,
Thu 28 Jan 2010, 23:19,
archived)
Hmm...Depends really would you "sue" the OP for not attributing this image?
When you put things on the web (especially without watermarking) people are also going to see it and put it in other places.
(
When you put things on the web (especially without watermarking) people are also going to see it and put it in other places.
CTU_Bauer,
Fri 29 Jan 2010, 1:13,
archived)
OohThat's better than mine.
( Bad Horsey Bring back Dr. Ubes Rub!,
Fri 29 Jan 2010, 9:28,
archived)
i wouldn'tI'd think "I've made a popular image on the internet and it's done the rounds - this is validation that occasionally I have a good idea. hooray!"
But some people have different opinions.
(But some people have different opinions.
rob,
Fri 29 Jan 2010, 8:21,
archived)