Home » Image Challenge » Creationism [Suggest a different challenge]
Creationism (This challenge is now closed)
Creationists believe that everything in the universe was created absolutely by a deity, and that evolution is hocus pocus, despite all the evidence to the contrary. Please portray this conflict using God's own image-manipulation software.
( , Wed 13 Jun 2007, 21:52)
Creationists believe that everything in the universe was created absolutely by a deity, and that evolution is hocus pocus, despite all the evidence to the contrary. Please portray this conflict using God's own image-manipulation software.
( , Wed 13 Jun 2007, 21:52)
ning all
It's trues I tells ya
Click to see what the hell it is (189KB)
( , Fri 15 Jun 2007, 5:44, More)
It's trues I tells ya
Click to see what the hell it is (189KB)
( , Fri 15 Jun 2007, 5:44, More)
strangemeister
I hate to post a cheaty compo post without a picture, but are you honestly serious?
The only reason it's called a "theory" is because that's what science is based on - assessing the facts and proposing ways to explain them, but always admitting that there could be another scientific way to explain them.
Of course, the "theory" of creationism or whatever it is you crazy kids believe in these days is nowt like that: facts aren't examined, and those that believe in it are closed-minded enough to insist evolution is not taught "so both sides of the argument are examined." BS.
And for evidence for mutations: how the hell else do you explain selective breeding? Animals can be bred to a specific strain very rapidly; wolves can be bred into something resembling collie dogs in looks and behaviour in only a few generations.
And the only piece of "evidence" creationists have is that that certain things can not evolve bit by bit, such as the flagella, as they would be obsolete. That's been proved wrong, as even crude motility is beneficial.
Rant over. Apologies for length of flagellum; it's only microscopic.
( , Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:32, More)
I hate to post a cheaty compo post without a picture, but are you honestly serious?
The only reason it's called a "theory" is because that's what science is based on - assessing the facts and proposing ways to explain them, but always admitting that there could be another scientific way to explain them.
Of course, the "theory" of creationism or whatever it is you crazy kids believe in these days is nowt like that: facts aren't examined, and those that believe in it are closed-minded enough to insist evolution is not taught "so both sides of the argument are examined." BS.
And for evidence for mutations: how the hell else do you explain selective breeding? Animals can be bred to a specific strain very rapidly; wolves can be bred into something resembling collie dogs in looks and behaviour in only a few generations.
And the only piece of "evidence" creationists have is that that certain things can not evolve bit by bit, such as the flagella, as they would be obsolete. That's been proved wrong, as even crude motility is beneficial.
Rant over. Apologies for length of flagellum; it's only microscopic.
( , Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:32, More)
'ning
Edit: I appreciate something about this post makes people want to ignore it, but I'd be grateful for any feedback as it's my first cartoon drawn from scratch and I'd like to improve.
( , Mon 18 Jun 2007, 10:43, More)
Edit: I appreciate something about this post makes people want to ignore it, but I'd be grateful for any feedback as it's my first cartoon drawn from scratch and I'd like to improve.
( , Mon 18 Jun 2007, 10:43, More)
Take on me....
Take me on...
I'll be gone
(I too have soiled myself with this chicanery)
( , Fri 15 Jun 2007, 10:51, More)
Take me on...
I'll be gone
(I too have soiled myself with this chicanery)
( , Fri 15 Jun 2007, 10:51, More)