There is an argument
for the proposal that they should simply not be allowed to do so. Public display of the remuneration and forcing them to validate it is part of that process.
When money is pulled from the collective pot and most of it is given to just a very few individuals, everyone who is not part of that group suffers.
As such, it is the business of everybody when select individuals are given such a huge share of the financial collective pot.
Currently, you can fit the people who own half the world's wealth onto a large bus, and that bus is getting smaller and smaller.
When people are starving and unable to simply live because of a lack of money, anyone defending that situation should be ashamed, not the people trying to stop it.
(
My Name was saying these words inside your head on, Sun 21 Oct 2018, 18:27,
Share,
Reply)
People are starving due to a lack of food.
Giving them that guy's shares in Persimmon isn't gonna feed all of them.
(, Sun 21 Oct 2018, 18:45, Share, Reply)
what collective pot is that exactly?
IN this case, it's shareholders' funds. The owners of the company get to vote on directors' remuneration every year.
This is a large bonus - I can't be arsed to check but normally big bonuses are whole wodge of LTIP share options have vested and thanks to the share price appreciation, they're worth a lot.
(
The Ann Coulter Fan Club Babylon is burning at, Sun 21 Oct 2018, 20:38,
Share,
Reply)