I think the question is more
Should that money be distributed further down the chain rather than given in bulk to single person? If not, why?
If a company is making so much profit that is able to pay these kind of sums, are the workers or customers getting ripped off?
(
Fadgebadger (1 like), Sun 21 Oct 2018, 18:33,
Share,
Reply)
No.... you have the question wrong.
The "if not why not" bit is backwards. The onus is on you to say "if so, why". The default should be that you're allowed stuff until it's proven you shouldn't have it not the other way around.
Can you explain why this money should be taken from this guy, and crucially why all of your money shouldn't be taken from you.
(, Sun 21 Oct 2018, 18:35, Share, Reply)
It is distributed down the chain.
The top 5% earners pay 47% of total tax collected.
The bottom 50% of earners pay only 10% of all tax.
(
After you my dear Alfonse No. After you., Sun 21 Oct 2018, 19:06,
Share,
Reply)
you access to stats!
Great!
So what proportion did they pay as tax on their total annual earnings?
(
colmcq2, Mon 22 Oct 2018, 10:38,
Share,
Reply)
I'd like to hear from the very expensive accountants the top earners employ...
(
Fadgebadger (1 like), Mon 22 Oct 2018, 22:54,
Share,
Reply)