That's an igoratio elenchi.
TCS was - I think - fairly clearly making a moral claim, so to respond by pointing out that there's no legal obligation is to argue against a point that wasn't being made.
The rest of the post is simply chaff.
(
Enzyme is powered by sunlight, Sun 21 Oct 2018, 20:48,
Share,
Reply)
He stated that
"the private sector is not exempt from answering questions justifying a salary", which when taken literally is not clearly making a moral claim.
But my response to it was both a legal and moral position. The moral counter claim is that "the onus is on the nosy fuckers to justify why it's any of their business" and not the other way around. My position simply happens to be backed up by the law.
(, Sun 21 Oct 2018, 21:03, Share, Reply)