yes.but it was more the fact that the site disappeeared, rather than the reasons for it, that he was talking about. "i mean, what if you rob and cal all work out how much this site is costing you to run and decide it's not worth it?" is kind of what he was getting at...
(,
Sun 31 Aug 2003, 13:50,
archived)
But in that casesurely donating less is more likely to make that situation occur?
(
StickFigureNinja is worried he may be on the list,
Sun 31 Aug 2003, 13:51,
archived)
It's bound to happen one dayalthough I like to think the baton would be passed on, so to speak.
(
supermoore: HUNG,
Sun 31 Aug 2003, 13:52,
archived)
yes.sorry, i was just reiterating his point, rather than agreeing with it.
(,
Sun 31 Aug 2003, 13:52,
archived)
Yeah, i knowi was just using that as a chance to make mine.
( StickFigureNinja is worried he may be on the list,
Sun 31 Aug 2003, 13:54,
archived)