![[challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif "Challenge Entry: Software that we really need"){kind=small}
they're taking over
From the Software that we really need challenge. See all 422 entries (closed)
(, Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:00, archived)
just out of interestyour opinion on this www.modernmodels.com/rev08444.htm
(,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:07,
archived)
I'm a bit 50/50 on itsome classic styling but a tad too modern really.
(,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:09,
archived)
Kinda what i wasthinking..
it has little plasma tv screens on the back of the headrests tho :)
(,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:11,
archived)
it has little plasma tv screens on the back of the headrests tho :)
actually, considering the liliesshould it be lilies or lillies?
why am I bothered about this?
why can't I sleep?
(why am I bothered about this?
why can't I sleep?
blyerkit e k trilby,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:09,
archived)
lilies, says Meriam-Webstersingular only has one l, so there's no need to add another in the plural
(
Or is it?,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:11,
archived)
this morning with richard not judywas antastic, it should return
(
lemony,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:04,
archived)
fnantastici cant see the x unless i stare really hard cos of my colour blindness, what a blessing it is
(,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:01,
archived)
well actually...i mean nobut about the hard to see x, i tried to fix it when i was making it but it still turned out bad.
(,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:03,
archived)
its not the wanking that does itits the poking your eyes while wanking that does it.
(,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:05,
archived)
That's why the end of the dick is largerto stop your hand slipping off and poking you in the eye. 100% of fact.
(
Enigmatic ™ Voice No More ©,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:07,
archived)
Wankingover rude magic eye pictures
/I hear
(/I hear
shambla www.gagaprinthouse.com,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:05,
archived)
is it me oris the matrix really shite?
discuss
(discuss
king_dong loves the hairstyles of the stars of dallas,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:02,
archived)
film 1 = goodfilm 2 = waste of time
film 3 = good if you ignore the plot and just enjoy the kickings
(film 3 = good if you ignore the plot and just enjoy the kickings
Dano,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:04,
archived)
film 1 = alrightfilm 2 = shite
film 3 = didn't bother going.
(film 3 = didn't bother going.
dipdapdop,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:16,
archived)
film 1= good.film 2 = shite.
film 3 = extra shite. with extremely thinly veiled bible/jesus references all over the damn place. At least those two finally died.
(,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:22,
archived)
film 3 = extra shite. with extremely thinly veiled bible/jesus references all over the damn place. At least those two finally died.
wellread the phone book upsidedown
it will have the same effect
(it will have the same effect
king_dong loves the hairstyles of the stars of dallas,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:06,
archived)
just see the first one....worth seeing...just forget that the last two ever existed.
(
Bitchpapa,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:29,
archived)
well...the first one was a fabulous ride through the wonderland of combining mindblowing special effects, technology, philosophy, action/adventure, and a well told story, leaving the viewer stunned and wanting more.
however the later films did not wow the viewer because he had already been exposed to most of the contents in the original film, so while it had a good continuation of the story, philosophy, technology, special effects, and action, it was nothing "special" when compared to the first. Compared to other movies at the time, they may have been far ahead, barring Lord of the rings, which i will refrain from commenting on here, they were not the giant leaps viewers expected from the later movies, though they were just good enough to keep the viewers coming back for more in the second and third installment. In conclusion, they were successful as a trilogy, and any one movie could have stood on its own provided the story line was explained, however, excepting the first film, they were not as powerful movies as they were built up to be by the advertising machines.
(however the later films did not wow the viewer because he had already been exposed to most of the contents in the original film, so while it had a good continuation of the story, philosophy, technology, special effects, and action, it was nothing "special" when compared to the first. Compared to other movies at the time, they may have been far ahead, barring Lord of the rings, which i will refrain from commenting on here, they were not the giant leaps viewers expected from the later movies, though they were just good enough to keep the viewers coming back for more in the second and third installment. In conclusion, they were successful as a trilogy, and any one movie could have stood on its own provided the story line was explained, however, excepting the first film, they were not as powerful movies as they were built up to be by the advertising machines.
Or is it?,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:10,
archived)
he said discussnot write a bloody essay :)
( Enigmatic ™ Voice No More ©,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:14,
archived)
wellthanks kermode;)
( king_dong loves the hairstyles of the stars of dallas,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:14,
archived)
especially as you consider the first one wasn't advertised much at allor if it was, i missed most of it.
i got taken to see it, and i hadn't even heard the name... so as you can imagine, when neo woke up in the real world, i had what can only be described as a "WHOA, FUCK ME WITH A TEASPOON" moment in the middle of the cinema and fell off my chair. it was ace.
(i got taken to see it, and i hadn't even heard the name... so as you can imagine, when neo woke up in the real world, i had what can only be described as a "WHOA, FUCK ME WITH A TEASPOON" moment in the middle of the cinema and fell off my chair. it was ace.
Dano,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:15,
archived)
yesthat sounds right. i don't remember much advertising for the first one. and the little i do remember had no mention of the real world outside the matrix
( Or is it?,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:16,
archived)
I have a home cinemaand matrix was the second most requested film by friends to watch for ages.
What was the first? Leon.
(What was the first? Leon.
Enigmatic ™ Voice No More ©,
Sat 21 Feb 2004, 23:22,
archived)