b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Film Sex For Prudes » Message 6777294

[challenge entry]

From the Film Sex For Prudes challenge. See all 251 entries (closed)

(, Wed 24 Jan 2007, 22:51, archived)
# pfffft!
 
I'm liking this competition already.

(, Wed 24 Jan 2007, 22:52, archived)
# I like the vast amount of previously unknown innuendo I'm uncovering while researching the compo.
(, Wed 24 Jan 2007, 22:53, archived)
# if there's innuendo you didn't know
I despair.
(, Wed 24 Jan 2007, 22:54, archived)
# I'm not a native speaker
so that keeps me slightly uninformed.
(, Wed 24 Jan 2007, 22:56, archived)
# damn woo but i still want to see a modern version of these old euphemisms
everyoens done the old ones but where are the new ones?

obviously im too shit to think of any but ithought the whole point of the compo was to design new ones not visualise old ones
(, Wed 24 Jan 2007, 22:54, archived)
# You READ the INSTRUCTIONS?!
(, Wed 24 Jan 2007, 22:57, archived)
# ^this
everyone else skims it and picks out the most relavent words
(, Wed 24 Jan 2007, 22:59, archived)
#
In the olden days, filmmakers couldn't show sex , so they'd refer to it by showing trains entering tunnels, waves crashing on beaches etc. But what if these restrictions were still in place? Design some modern visual euphemisms for sex , but keep it 'innocent'. Animation encouraged.
(, Wed 24 Jan 2007, 23:07, archived)
# yeah, thats
about right
(, Wed 24 Jan 2007, 23:37, archived)
# yeah new modern euphemisms, not the old euphemisms simply placed in a modern setting
obviously the latter is a lot lot easier than the former
(, Wed 24 Jan 2007, 23:00, archived)
# Is he still the blonde knob from Steps?
(, Wed 24 Jan 2007, 22:57, archived)
#
(, Wed 24 Jan 2007, 22:58, archived)
# it was totally irrelevant anyway
(, Wed 24 Jan 2007, 23:02, archived)
# Arf!


(, Wed 24 Jan 2007, 22:59, archived)
# Haha
I loik this
(, Thu 25 Jan 2007, 9:01, archived)