I decided for myself recently that no real genitals or tits, nor obvious porn origins for the main pic was a decent rule of thumbbut I have seen stuff that breaks my own rules get by without any excitement on the boards plenty of times purely 'cos it was very heterosexual, and I got toasted for one that had neither genitals nor porn site origins but had very gay refs (2 guys naked in a very 'up the chuff' position taken from a safe sex flyer in a 'How Gay Are You' test pisstake) so it's still bloody hard to call at times, but it does seem gay/for-the-ladies oriented stuff is considered disproportionally more dodgy than het/for-the-boys stuff by the majority, but that's got obvious reasons.
I do think it might be helpful to get clearer guidelines in place.
(I do think it might be helpful to get clearer guidelines in place.
..wil,
Thu 11 Oct 2007, 17:27,
archived)