i have no idea
seemingly a PC name so as not to offend anyone,
except it offends me and everyone else i imagine
( ,
Tue 11 Dec 2007, 14:46,
archived)
except it offends me and everyone else i imagine
It's actually a Daily Mail 'scandal'
that was based on 0% of fact - it was a winter shopping campaign in Birmingham about 5 years ago I believe.
Doesn't stop the nutters who write for the Daily Mail running the story every chuffing year.
( ,
Tue 11 Dec 2007, 14:48,
archived)
Doesn't stop the nutters who write for the Daily Mail running the story every chuffing year.
exactly
Mail readers are angry, so the paper has to make up a scandal for them to be angry about.
It's just sad when otherwise rational people fall for it.
( ,
Tue 11 Dec 2007, 14:49,
archived)
It's just sad when otherwise rational people fall for it.
The pen is mightier than the sword
After all, it is language that separates us from the beasts.
Thus:
Dear sir,
I feel I must take issue with the unnecessary scandalous overtones occasionally detectable in your esteemed publication.
It displeases me to see your journalistic standards lowered in such a fashion, surely you are above such low-brow tabloid behaviour?
Yours
Brig. Fridgeignton Freezerous-Smythe (Retired.)
And I shall address it to "Cunts, London".
( ,
Tue 11 Dec 2007, 15:43,
archived)
Thus:
Dear sir,
I feel I must take issue with the unnecessary scandalous overtones occasionally detectable in your esteemed publication.
It displeases me to see your journalistic standards lowered in such a fashion, surely you are above such low-brow tabloid behaviour?
Yours
Brig. Fridgeignton Freezerous-Smythe (Retired.)
And I shall address it to "Cunts, London".
1998 oops
but what's a few years between outraged of tunbridge well's
( ,
Tue 11 Dec 2007, 14:51,
archived)
I don't wiki
I rely on that amorphous blob between my ears...
YES, MY NOSE HAR DE HAR HAR HAR :)
( ,
Tue 11 Dec 2007, 14:54,
archived)
YES, MY NOSE HAR DE HAR HAR HAR :)