consider this postulate
arguing on the internet is stupid.
Please refute this claim and provide it context within the history of western philisophical thought in 500 words or more.
(
hanke murphy, I'm a mess,
Sat 29 Dec 2007, 16:08,
archived)
lol, stfu noob.
:)
edit: I felt dirty typing that.
(
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Sat 29 Dec 2007, 16:10,
archived)
Roffle!
(
mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Sat 29 Dec 2007, 16:13,
archived)
No it's not, no it's not,
no it's not times 165.
(
_Felix 's school of dance and occult sciences,
Sat 29 Dec 2007, 16:49,
archived)
U R HITLA LOL
(
mofaha ┐( ˘_˘)┌ ʅ(́◡◝)ʃ,
Sat 29 Dec 2007, 17:07,
archived)
A+
good use of sources.
eloquent.
well structured.
(
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Sat 29 Dec 2007, 17:08,
archived)