Well, I wouldn't look too closely at the left side of the shellbut as the pic I used was a macro that went acutely out of focus towards the rear, it was as good as I could be bothered with...
(
..wil,
Sat 12 Jan 2008, 16:29,
archived)
It looks good.The poor quality of the source has covered any seams up well.
(,
Sat 12 Jan 2008, 16:30,
archived)
I could have solved it if I'd taken more time, Sharpen will only get you so farand I'd have had to have been clever with using parts of the focussed shell to solve it completely, but I was more interested in the image than the technicalities really, tho I do prefer to manage both, but sometimes time is an issue.
Still, always the main point is, did it do the job, and I think yeh, I got away with it, LOL! ;)
(Still, always the main point is, did it do the job, and I think yeh, I got away with it, LOL! ;)
..wil,
Sat 12 Jan 2008, 16:48,
archived)